Hi, > On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:35PM +0200, manu@... wrote: > > Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote: > > > > > Let's see how Sendmail headers look like when RDNS is not available. > > > We can then make that the default behaviour and add an option for > > > backward compatibility? > > > > There are certainly people out of there that made scripts to parse > > milter-greylist log output. If you change the behaviour, this is nasty > > for them. IMO the default setting should be backaward compatibility. > > Ok, I dug through some pieces of the sendmail code and did some > tests on an emulated Ubuntu installation: It seems that the way > milter-greylist logs unresolvable clients is consistent with that of > sendmail. > > Sendmail, however, has not the same approach when it comes to > received headers: > > log (rdns): relay=some.host.name. [1.2.3.4] > log (no-rdns): relay=[5.6.7.8] [5.6.7.8] > > hdr (rdns): (some.host.name. [1.2.3.4]) > hdr (no-rdns): ([5.6.7.8]) > > I think we should move that tiny piece of code into spamd.c and make > the injected received header look like one from sendmail. Does this mean that you have to be running spamd to take advantage of that code? Michael. > Preliminary patch is attached. I won't have a chance to test it > until somewhen next week. > > Petar Bogdanovic > > P.S. > It would be still very helpful if a sendmail-user > could confirm my observations. > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] lists composed of spf servers
2009-05-09 by Michael Mansour
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.