Michael Menge a \ufffdcrit : > Quoting ondrej_v0 <ondrej_v0@...>: > >> But speaking about the documentation - it should be stated there what >> actually blacklisting means. Does it mean that instead of 451 >> temperror the sender receives 550 harderror? > > Yes blacklisting is a 5xx harderror. But we don't use it in milter-greylist Yes you can use blacklisting in milter-greylist (at least 4.0): acl blacklist addr aa.bb.cc.dd msg "I don't like you" > We had some problems with spf, as > > 1. there are more spammes that have spf records then regular users The "good way" is to combine greylisting, SPF and "reputation", by means of DNSRBLs and DNSWLs. Milter-greylist 4.0 can do that: - whitelist "local" clients (those who are expected to use your SMTP server anyway) - whitelist "known good" clients who are listed in DNSWLs or locally-crafted whitelist (including ISP server farms which do not pass greylisting) - blacklist "unwanted" clients whith DNSRBL (DUL and otherwise dynamic ISP clients) - "heavy" greylist (long delay) "suspicious" clients (those listed in exploits DNSRBL lists, or whose DNS name matches a locally-defined regexp list) - whitelist SPF-pass clients (except those who have a fake "+all" record) - "light" greylist (short delay) all other clients you can also blacklist SPF-fail clients, and heavy greylist SPF-softfail clients, catching a few % more spam, but exposing to block legitimate but badly configured mail (non SRS-compliant forwarding...). The idea is that only unknown clients should hit the last-resort greylist ACL. In that order, MX validity and MX-as-SPF (poor man SPF) tests would be great to help reduce the hit rate of this last-resort ACL. > 2. forwarding breakes spf for some forwarder, and i have found no easy way > for our users to whitelist the forwarding mailserver as they normaly > don't know the ip Forwarders shoud use SRS. But if you combine with DNS whitelists, chances are forwarders are already whitelisted. -- Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a ete trouve.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Some features for future releases...
2008-01-22 by Benoit Branciard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.