Milter-greylist

ondrej_v0 <ondrej_v0@...> wrote:

> I can not wait to see DKIM to be implemented as well.
> The only disadvantage with DKIM is that you have to receive the whole
> message to judge - an that makes it a bit prone to false positives.
> But still.

I started looking at DKIM but I stalled because of that problem (See the
message below). How would you use DKIM in milter-greylist?

--- cut here ---
Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@...> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:54:17AM -0000, Jim Hermann wrote:
> > It contains this Overview, among other API documentation:
> >     5. stat = dkim_body(dkim, ...);
> >           + pass  to  libdkim a chunk of the body that should be included
> >             in computation of the digest to be verified (currently all of
> >             it)
> 
> Ok, that's how it works (I'm discovering, I was completely clueless).
> That means DKIM and DomainKeys can only be checked in a DATA-stage ACL.
> At that time, the greylisting was already taken. I wonder how that could
> be used.
--- cut here ---

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...