On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, manu@... wrote: > Dan Mahoney, System Admin <danm@...> wrote: > >> Greylisting.org suggests something called "peer to peer whitelisting" -- >> which seems odd to me because, well, why should I install support for >> another protocol if it's inbuilt to (and possible with) the DNSBL >> protocol, on a nearly universal level? > > I guess the goal is to address a possible DDoS attack of DNSRBL by > spammers. Sure, because spammers will DDOS a whitelist, so then everyone's mail is as delayed as theirs is? -Dan -- "this is too stupid even for irc" -mtreal, EFnet #macintosh, 09/15/2K, 12:33 AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] lightgreylist.org
2007-10-25 by Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.