Milter-greylist

Dan Mahoney, System Admin <danm@...> wrote:

> Greylisting.org suggests something called "peer to peer whitelisting" --
> which seems odd to me because, well, why should I install support for
> another protocol if it's inbuilt to (and possible with) the DNSBL 
> protocol, on a nearly universal level?

I guess the goal is to address a possible DDoS attack of DNSRBL by
spammers.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...