On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, California_Condor wrote:
> I have several subscribers to mailing lists on my site who use
> earthlink/mindspring as their internet provider. Earthlink apparently
> treats any 451 error as a permanent error by having a 0 retry time.
> Obviously, I don't want to whitelist all of their netblock. Has
> anyone attempted to talk to them how bad it is to reject mail sent by
> subscribers without a retry? And does anyone have a list of the mail
> servers from which mail may be forwarded from earthlink/mindspring?
I'm just starting to see this behaviour from charter.net, a cable
TV/Internet company.
-----------EXAMPLE---------------
Reporting-MTA: dns; que03.charter.net
Arrival-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:45:14 -0400
Received-From-MTA: dns; aa10.charter.net (10.20.200.162)
Content-Type: text/plain
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <sanitized@...>
Action: failed
Status: 5.2.0
Remote-MTA: dns; sanitized.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 451 4.7.1 Greylisting in action, please come back later
-----------EXAMPLE---------------
I haven't spoken to them yet, but I was planning on it. However, I don't
expect positive results. After all, I don't see any way that this was
anything but a conscious decision on their part, and I can't imagine that
my voice, even if it did reach decision-making ears, would sway their
already completed thought process.
--
"Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some
of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?"
-- Patricia O Tuama, rissa@...
finger://ephemeron.org/bigby
http://www.ephemeron.org/~bigby/
irc://irc.ephemeron.org/#the_pub
news://news.ephemeron.org/alt.lemursMessage
Re: [milter-greylist] Earthlink treats 4xx as 5xx errors
2007-09-13 by Bigby Findrake
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.