Collin Baillie <collin@...> wrote: > Reverse greylisting removes the need for (a) whitelisting domains, > and (b) using a subnetmatch clause (unless the reverse lookup fails) > and achieves fully functional greylisting not possible with any > combination of whitelists/subnet matches. Well, I guess nobody opposes to the addition of fancy features. 4.0 alpha has become more a kind of swiss-knife anti-spam tool than just a greylist filter. After all, nobody have to use new features. Perhaps someone will want to code the feature. Usually, my only concern is about preventing the config file to become even more messy than it is now. What syntax would you propose for configuring reverse greylisting in greylist.conf? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Weak greylisting
2007-06-19 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.