At 15:13 4/05/2007, Michael Menge wrote: >Hi > >weak greylisting is possible with the -L option or with subnetmatch in >greylist.conf > >The reverse greylisting is not possible with milter-greylist as far as i know. >I don't see the advantage form reverse greylisting over the >subnetmatch (weak greylisting). Could you give us an example where >reverse would be of use and a subnetmatch not? > >regards Ok, after more experience with milter-greylist, I can agree that subnetmatch would work like weak greylisting. However, weak greylisting (you may remember from reading the gps web page) is the last resort fallback for reverse greylisting failure. Reverse greylisting is advantageous where (of course) a mail farm includes servers not on the same 'subnet'. Say I have a couple of servers 203.11.234.15, and 203.11.234.16 and I have 3 servers in 64.117.82.98, 64.117.82.112 and 64.117.82.113, but they all resolve backe to mail*.my-odd-domain.com. NO decent subnet match would work in this case, where reverse greylisting would. Of course, if I don't have the reverse lookup of those servers working, the _fallback_ to weak or subnet match greylisting would fail. Right now (Milter greylist 3.1) I can do acl whitelist domain my-odd-domain.com and everything get's through without being greylisted. But what if this was a public ISP which sold broadband services, and a spammer bought bandwidth from them. Suddenly I'm faced with, either receiving spam straight in, or losing valid emails because the server farm is from a very diverse IP range. If Milter-greylist had reverse greylisting, if person.a@... emails me (thrugh the ISPs SMTP servers), their address, my address and the my-odd-domain.com triplet would be greylisted and eventually deliver. However if the spammer bulk emails me from his my-odd-domain.com broadband connection, the spammer@... address, my address and the my-odd-domain.com triplet would be greylisted, and effectively denied because his bulk email software performs true to form. Reverse greylisting removes the need for (a) whitelisting domains, and (b) using a subnetmatch clause (unless the reverse lookup fails) and achieves fully functional greylisting not possible with any combination of whitelists/subnet matches. Collin
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Weak greylisting
2007-06-19 by Collin Baillie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.