> Computers are cleverer than mere mortals, so let milter-greylist do that > consistency checking for us. > Milter-greylist should use max(specified_autowhite, timeout) as the > autowhite value, put a warning message into the log, and continue. > Add documentation which states that that's how it will be, and it's > goof-proof (well, at least consistent in a way which won't unnecessarily > loose mails). > Phil How about following behaviour? (autowhite=1d, timeout=5d) 1. Return 451 against an email at 0:00. 2. Accept the retried email at 0:20 and add the sender to autowhitelist whose expiration date is 120:20. 3. Receive another email at 50:00. No change. 4. Receive another email at 110:00. The expiration date is postponed to 134:00.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] FYI: Murphy's law of autowhitelist
2006-11-11 by AIDA Shinra