Mart Pirita wrote: > > > Tere. > > > > Others I'm happy to greylist with are: > > > > dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net - Dynamic IP Address ranges (NOT a Dial Up list!) > > > > bl.spamcop.net > > > > psbl.surriel.com > > > > combined.njabl.org (127.0.0.3) > > > > Country-specific greylisting by using the lists from countries.nerd.dk > > might also be worthwhile. 99.99% (or more) of the emails we receive > > which originate in China are spam, for example. > > > > > I use also no-more-funn.moensted.dk and sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org but only in > sendmail, not with greylist, as this keeps channel more free and > greylist can deal only with these, who pass the RBL check. > > -- > Mart sbl-xbl is being superceded by zen.spamhaus.org (http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/index.lasso). In my experience it is accurate enough to be used at the MTA level (as is cbl.abuseat.org, which is incorporated in xbl and zen). And the muliplicity of returned "A" records underlines the reason for my original enhancement request. How accurate is no-more-funn? Phil
Message
Re: OT: (Was Re: [milter-greylist] RFE: Improved DNSRBL handling)
2006-11-10 by Phil Randal
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.