--- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, Martin Paul <martin@p...>
wrote:
[...]
> I think this only applies if you want to create an executable from
> just lex source, which isn't the case with milter-greylist. Checking
> the Makefile and output of make, it doesn't pull in libl or libfl
> anywhere.
Hmmm, okay.
So just shipping them should stop make from trying to rebuild them (as
long, as they're newer as the depedencies). Should work.
[...]
> I agree on both, and I like milter-greylist especially for the short
> list of prerequisites. Shouldn't stop one from making the short
> list even shorter, if the only downside is a plus 50kb on download
> size.
Well, if we wanted to save a bit on shipped size, the CVS dir
shouldn't be there ;) (debian's packagaging "lint" tool doesn't like
it either.)
And most autoconf'd packages don't ship Makefile.
Just a few random thoughts.
ElrondMessage
files in tarball (was milter-greylist 2.0 beta7 released)
2005-05-12 by Elrond
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.