On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:45:54AM -0000, Elrond wrote: > I haven't checked for sure, but usually flex and lex like to link > against libfl.a or libl.a. So you'd need the *fitting* version of that > anyway. I think this only applies if you want to create an executable from just lex source, which isn't the case with milter-greylist. Checking the Makefile and output of make, it doesn't pull in libl or libfl anywhere. > Well, if you build stuff from sources, you should really be prepared > to install some prerequisits. And the prereqs of milter-greylist are > really harmless! I agree on both, and I like milter-greylist especially for the short list of prerequisites. Shouldn't stop one from making the short list even shorter, if the only downside is a plus 50kb on download size. mp.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: milter-greylist 2.0 beta7 released
2005-05-12 by Martin Paul