Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2010-04-08 by tim.tashpulatov
Hi all, I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. Thanks!
2010-04-08 by Michael Hawkins
Tim, The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. Mike ________________________________
From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question Hi all, I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. Thanks!
2010-04-09 by tim.tashpulatov
Mike, Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod? --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...> wrote:
> > Tim, > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. > > Mike > > > > > ________________________________ > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question > > > Hi all, > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. > > Thanks! >
2010-04-09 by Everett
I still have a poly with the mood slayer and hawk800 kit. I did the EX with the full upgrade and the only difference I noticed was when doing a fast sweep the AtomaHawk can sound digital. I personally think it's a neat sound, but the original (obviously analog) has no such effect. --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "tim.tashpulatov" <tim.tashpulatov@...> wrote:
> > Mike, > > Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod? > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@> wrote: > > > > Tim, > > > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). > > > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@> > > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM > > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. > > > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. > > > > Thanks! > > >
2010-04-09 by Everett
*Moog Slayer... hehe --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "Everett" <evy_newt@...> wrote:
> > I still have a poly with the mood slayer and hawk800 kit. I did the EX with the full upgrade and the only difference I noticed was when doing a fast sweep the AtomaHawk can sound digital. I personally think it's a neat sound, but the original (obviously analog) has no such effect. > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "tim.tashpulatov" <tim.tashpulatov@> wrote: > > > > Mike, > > > > Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod? > > > > > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@> wrote: > > > > > > Tim, > > > > > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). > > > > > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@> > > > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM > > > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. > > > > > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >
2010-04-09 by Michael Hawkins
HI Tim, as Everett points out, I have several customers that installed the HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk into their already moog slayer modified Poly-800's. Both upgrade kits were designed to be installed without disturbing an existing moog slayer mod. Mike ________________________________ From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, April 9, 2010 1:35:27 AM Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Moog Slayer pots question Mike, Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod? --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@ ...> wrote:
> > Tim, > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. > > Mike > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@ ...> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question > > > Hi all, > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. > > Thanks! >
2010-04-09 by narfman96
I can vouch for that. The Moog Slayer, 12/24db filter switch, and FM-800 mods all work great with the Hawk-800 in my Mark II. If you need any help or have any detailed questions feel free to email me. Fran --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...> wrote:
> > HI Tim, > > as Everett points out, I have several customers that installed the HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk into their already moog slayer modified Poly-800's. > > Both upgrade kits were designed to be installed without disturbing an existing moog slayer mod. > > Mike > > > > > ________________________________ > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Fri, April 9, 2010 1:35:27 AM > Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Moog Slayer pots question > > > Mike, > > Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod? > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@ ...> wrote: > > > > Tim, > > > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance). > > > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@ ...> > > To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com > > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM > > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type. > > > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically. > > > > Thanks! > > >