Korg Poly800/EX800 Users group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: Moog Slayer pots question

2010-04-09 by Everett

I still have a poly with the mood slayer and hawk800 kit.  I did the EX with the full upgrade and the only difference I noticed was when doing a fast sweep the AtomaHawk can sound digital.  I personally think it's a neat sound, but the original (obviously analog) has no such effect.

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "tim.tashpulatov" <tim.tashpulatov@...> wrote:
>
> Mike,
> 
> Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod?
> 
> 
> 
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@> wrote:
> >
> > Tim,
> > 
> > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance).
> > 
> > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@>
> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM
> > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question
> > 
> >   
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type.
> > 
> > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.