HP9180 w/ APP custom vs standard profile?
2008-09-29 by Jim Miller
We ve got a 9180 which has in the past given us good but not perfect results. We re considering getting a Spyder3 Studio to create our own profile for the HP
Thread
HP9180 w/ APP custom vs standard profile?
Re: [colorvision_group] HP9180 w/ APP custom vs standard profile?
2008-09-29 by cdtobie
On Sep 28, 2008, at 11:23:52 PM, "Jim Miller" wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
I definately prefer the Spyder3Print results with the 9180 on photo papers to the canned profiles; but perhaps more important than the default result is the ability to quickly and easily adjust the results, to whatever you might prefer.We've got a 9180 which has in the past given us good but not "perfect" results.We're considering getting a Spyder3 Studio to create our own profile for the HP Advanced Photo Paper to substitute for the default profile provided by HP.We only use APP at this time but might use other papers in the future.Has anyone had experience with this paper and printer with the Spyder3 Studio and if so was the output produced more accurate? Results with this paper/printer are the prime concern at this time.
--
C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3Re: HP9180 w/ APP custom vs standard profile?
2008-09-29 by mdgolfbum
just put a spyder3 studio on order. also going to try printing from psv7, pscs3 (trial download...waiting for cs4 to upgrade) and also lr2.0. we're now using lr1.4.1. printed out the "sample page" that is stored on the printer from the printer menu and it printed perfectly with no saturation or redshift issues. so it's definitely something happening at the computer end: lr or the profile. since we're using application managed colors and relative mapping i don't think it's the fault of the printer or its driver. tnx jtm