On Sep 28, 2008, at 11:23:52 PM, "Jim Miller" wrote:
I definately prefer the Spyder3Print results with the 9180 on photo papers to the canned profiles; but perhaps more important than the default result is the ability to quickly and easily adjust the results, to whatever you might prefer.We've got a 9180 which has in the past given us good but not "perfect" results.We're considering getting a Spyder3 Studio to create our own profile for the HP Advanced Photo Paper to substitute for the default profile provided by HP.We only use APP at this time but might use other papers in the future.Has anyone had experience with this paper and printer with the Spyder3 Studio and if so was the output produced more accurate? Results with this paper/printer are the prime concern at this time.
--
C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3