Well if you are achieveing a dmax of 1.79 on any matte media with any pigment inkset you are beating everyone else in the world so I would stick with that :-). john --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Michele Berti" <michele@...> wrote: > > I didn't know... printing with an R1800 I just made some readings and > here what I've got: > > Epson Velvet Fine Art Paper = 1.79 > Epson Enhanced Matte = 1.72 > Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308 = 1.68 > > How is bad? > > --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 4/7/07 11:57:31 AM, michele@ writes: > > > > > > > Sorry to ask but how do you measure dmax with PFP? > > > > > > > You use the measure function in the tools menu, place the spectro on > a black > > patch, and read out the number in the density section. Best to > calibrate > > first, and take a couple of other reading to warm up the device, > since you are > > taking an absolute reading, with a lot of leverage behind it > (reading darkness > > with a light sensor...) > > > > C. David Tobie > > Product Technology Manager > > ColorVision Business Division > > DataColor Inc. > > CDTobie@ > > www.colorvision.com > > > > > > ************************************** > > See what's free at > > http://www.aol.com. > > >
Message
Re: dmax w/PFP is inferior to ABW
2007-04-09 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.