I did name the Monitors and Graphics card and OS but I will do so again to be clear The OS is XPpro Both monitors are Samsung 213t LCD monitors and both are running from one PCI Card; The Graphics card is an Asus PCI EAX 1600xt. I am running one care via the Digital output of the card and via the Analog output. I would like to upgrade. I have the Suite but I bought the parts separately. I do not see any serial numbers on the Spyder. I do see serial numbers on the PrintFIx Puck 0005487 I think both are registered. Do I qualify for the Suite upgrade at $90? Thanks The room totally darkened save for the one monitor I calibrating. I use the SAME settings to calibrate each monitor. I disconnect each monitor in turn as I can not figure out how to get the Spyder to run on and anything but the primary monitor and I want to make sure there is no confusion about which monitor is being profiled. After calibrating both I reconnect them and assign each with it's designated profile. Aside from printing I find it difficult to trust the device or software if the two monitors don't match. --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/25/06 5:55:25 AM, swp91011@... writes: > > > > I can NOT make both my monitors look the same! > > > There are several levels on which you could be attempting this, so the answer > is not simple... > > > Can someone here help with some experience? > > > Only if I know just what you are attempting to do, and what monitors, OS, > type and number of video cards, type of each monitor involved, ambient lighting > level, and settings used are... > > > > I can ask teck support after the holiday but I'd like to get my new > > device working now. (Beside, my experience so far is that their tech > > support if rather lame.) > > > All tech support starts with a first tier that is intended to help people > find their serial numbers, and do other basic things. Your job is to ask clear > and specific enough questions to get forwarded to the correct advanced support > person. Thats not lame, its normal. Also, asking via email, instead of > insisting on a human voice, is more effective, as it allows for bumping support to the > corrrect people much more easily. > > > > So here is the setup: > > > > > > With XPpro I have two Samsung 213t monitors running on one Asus EAX > > 1600xt graphics card. > > > > One monitor is running analog and one digital. > > > Less than ideal, but better than one CRT and one LCD... > > > One is one yr. older than the other. > > There are slight differenced in the presets possible depending on > > Analog or Digital, but basically they both start out pretty much the > > same before profiling. > > > Still failed to note if they are LCD or CRT... > > > > I remove the Catalyst control panel as I have read that can be a > > problem when there are two many bits of software trying to run > > profiles. I'm trying to keep it simple. > > > That should be fine, as long as your monitors work properly without it. Still > didn't mention OS either... or number of video carts, or their type... that > effects the level of control you will have on Windows, but not on the Mac, so > this all is important to the correct answer... > > > > I've used the Sypder in a darkened room multiple times on each monitor > > but I had to disable my primary monitor to force the Spyder to proflie > > my secondary one. > > > > Not if you are using Spyder2PRO, the package intended for advanced multiple > monitor matching. If you are using plain Spyder2 software, all you can do is > get relative, not absolute, matching, which is fine for two monitors in > different spots, but won't tune two monitors to a tight match side-by-side... > > > After I named and saved the secondary profile I > > re-enabled both monitors and assigned the correct profile to the each > > monitor. > > > Thats something of a hack, you are trying to use a wrench as a hammer; get > Spyder2PRO if you wish to tune monitors to match one another... > > > > Consistently, the Primary (digital) monitor has a yellowish cast and > > the analog one seems more correctly white (to my eyes). > > > Your eyes are influenced by the dominant whitepoint in the room, so they > can't really be trusted for this. But thats not really an issue in this case, as > you don't have much in the way of tools for anything but a simple calibration > anyways with the basic Spyder2 package... > > > > Which one is right? Can I trust EITHER one? ( I think not if they > > are not the same the tool obviously failed. ) > > > "The tool" will do different things at different settings. If you choose > Native Whitepoint, and don't match the whites in some other manner, then they > would (appropriately) be different. If you choose, say 6500k, and balance them > either with RGB gains corrections, or let the Spyder2 software do it at the > videocard level, then they should both have similar whitepoints... BUT if you > aren't running both through the same (nonPCI-Express) video card on Windows (none > of this info is in you note) then you still can't get both to match, as Windows > won't treat them both seperately, so you would have an OS level failure that > custom ICC profiles and video correction data can't fix, you'd have to get a > Dual PCI Express card, or a second videocard to make that work. > > > > And mostly, what can I do to make this expensive tool work. > > > Doesn't actually sound like you have the expensive tool, it sounds like you > have the moderately priced version... Spyder2PRO offers lots of extra tools for > checking and adjusting your monitor for multiple monitor setups. > > > > Any ideas? > > > Lots, but thats as much as I can offer from the info given... > > Happy Holidays, > C. David Tobie > Product Technology Manager > ColorVision Business Division > DataColor Inc. > CDTobie@... > www.colorvision.com >
Message
Re: Need help with Spyder Pro 2
2006-12-27 by Phiegze
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.