> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Medeiros [mailto:igormpc@hotmail.com] > Sent: 17 April 2003 12:50 > > 1_what's the expected price for the parts? i'm in brazil, so > i might not be > able to find difficult parts... I have created the BOM files from the schematics, but am yet to look up prices for them. I will be creating a list of parts, with both Farnell and Jameco order numbers and prices. This will be a few days yet though. > 2_ok, it's my time to ask if you can add nnnn... see > http://www.samwatson.com/DrumStepper/ and > http://www.samwatson.com/pd/partaccel.html > > why hardware sequencers usually don't have midi delays and > other kind of > midi fx? i think this is a great chance to make a really unique midi > sequencer with more creative options... The problem I have with midi delays IMO is that they are typically only directed to one device on the midi bus, but if the delay is generated at the sequencer, then the extra data for delayed notes appears on the common midi bus. I may implement these sorts of things in the sequencer, but my personal preference would be for a separate midi delay/effect unit that could be patched into the midi bus just before the device the effect is to be applied to. This minimises use of the shared midi bandwidth. I'll be happy to be persuaded to add these sorts of features if there is a demand for it, but not until after the first run of boards is out in the wild, and end users have had time to consider which features should be added first. The ease of doing a sysex firmware upugrade, and the significant amount of program space left in the sequencer (only 24k out of 63k available) means that these features can be added easily in time. Cheers, Colin f
Message
RE: [analogue-sequencer] RE: Functional spec
2003-04-19 by yahoo@colinfraser.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.