Yahoo Groups archive

SynthModules

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:14 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 8 of 22 · 1099 messages matched

PSIM-1 Status Update

2005-05-11 by synthmodules

Well folks... I'm making progress like crazy now! Things at work have slowed down thus allowing me to spend more time working on the modules. I've also been getting about an hour a day or so in the mornings in and actually have today off! I'm quickly running out of parts to stuff

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Anyone interested in helping with interrupt MIDI output?

2005-05-06 by djbrow54

I've got no response from BasicMicro on their serial transmit interrupts not working. I have, however, modified my code for an interesting workaround. I am using TimerA to generate 512 uS interrupts and using this as my transmit interrupt. In the routine to put a byte into a buff

Thread view Attachments: 0

Anyone interested in helping with interrupt MIDI output?

2005-04-29 by djbrow54

My PSIM template code runs with timer interrupts and MIDI input interrupts. I've been trying to get MIDI outputs to run with interrupts instead of polling. After a couple of days of working with the AtomPro I've come to the conclusion that the oninterrupt command is not working f

Thread view Attachments: 0

PSIM-1 Update

2005-04-18 by synthmodules

Hello everyone. I'm back! Okay, here's what was going on... roughly a month ago, my computer decided it didn't like running Windows XP anymore. The ASUS A7N8X Deluxe mainboard blew something and in the progress took out the hard drive partition. Oh, but that wasn't the half of it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Once again, time for an update

2005-04-12 by mrboningen

all i can do is agree with the last two posts, 14 months and still waiting... gregg. --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "Scott E." wrote: > Agreed. > > I have been a staunch supporter of Brice, because I know how easily one > can burn-out when trying to produce the same thing o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Once again, time for an update

2005-04-09 by Scott E.

Agreed. I have been a staunch supporter of Brice, because I know how easily one can burn-out when trying to produce the same thing over and over. And I have posted email of support and encouragement over the last year. That said, however, I am becoming increasingly disappointed i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Once again, time for an update

2005-04-09 by Larry Hendry

Brice, It has been 5 weeks since the last word of any kind about progress. The update is shown below. At that time, all boards were "80% populated" and "all front panels were complete" with jacks and such. What has been the progress since the message below? And, don't you think t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: coming through?

2005-03-28 by tontaub

Yeah Larry, at least I could find your message in the archive ;-) That was the most recen that was posted nevertheless ... cheerio, ;-) Michael. (Still hating the new layout of Yahoo! Groups) --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Hendry" wrote: > > Looks like I am no longer

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] coming through?

2005-03-26 by dave bradley

I got it. Dave --- Larry Hendry wrote: > > Looks like I am no longer getting messages for this > group. I hate > computers. Someone please send me private mail if > this cvam through. > > While I'm here. What is the latests status Brice? > > Thanks, > Larry Hendry > > > > > _____

Thread view Attachments: 0

coming through?

2005-03-26 by Larry Hendry

Looks like I am no longer getting messages for this group. I hate computers. Someone please send me private mail if this cvam through. While I'm here. What is the latests status Brice? Thanks, Larry Hendry

Thread view Attachments: 0

MIDI monitor program uploaded

2005-03-20 by djbrow54

I am working on a Kurzweil Mark III and I was trying to determine what some of the MIDI controllers were. I just don't have a good MIDI monitor so I wrote this to speak the hex MIDI codes received. I was able to figure out what all the controller assignments were. I had added Spe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [WTB] PSIM

2005-03-16 by m0n075

Still looking for one :) --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "m0n075" wrote: > > > Yeah anyone wanna sell a PSIM ? > Let me know. > > Regards, > > Dennis

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: Time for a progress report

2005-03-11 by Larry Hendry

Thanks Brice. I think this is the kind of update that people like to hear. A good appraisal of the current situation. Certainly we all appreicate you unwillingness to shortcut. I'm sorry to hear of your family loss. And, it does steal away something you have been looking forward

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: Time for a progress report

2005-03-10 by Andrew Scheidler

Future PSIM Owners - I am glad to hear that delivery is nearing! While your frustration is understandable, temper it with the fact that the PSIM is worth the wait. Having had mine for 11 months now, I would hand mine over for a year if I had to... as long as I knew it was coming

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Time for a progress report

2005-03-10 by synthmodules

Larry (and everyone else), Sorry for the delay in replying. I missed the message and haven't had time to weed through all the emails (yes, I get over 1,000 spam messages a day to my primary email address). Anyway, "Super Sunday" has actually been three (3) super Sundays so far. A

Thread view Attachments: 0

Not even an update?

2005-03-07 by Larry Hendry

Brice, Can you offer us an update since your super soldering Sunday? Larry H __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

Thread view Attachments: 0

Time for a progress report

2005-02-27 by Larry Hendry

Brice, Can you bring us up-to-date on progress since and including "Super Sunday." Thanks Larry Hendry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: PSIM-1 Update

2005-02-12 by pow333us

--- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, Doug Wellington wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 03:23:06 -0000, synthmodules > wrote: > > Yes, everyone who ordered already has a module waiting here. > > Well, if anyone is tired of waiting for their module, please contact > me, and I'll buy i

Thread view Attachments: 0

PSIM-1 Update

2005-02-09 by synthmodules

Hello everyone. Last Sunday's PSIM-1 building party went great. We made a LOT of progress on all the modules and will be getting together again next Sunday as well. This is going a LOT faster and all the modules will be completed much sooner now. Thanks and take care, Brice http:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] PSIM-1 Update

2005-02-05 by Doug Wellington

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 03:23:06 -0000, synthmodules wrote: > Yes, everyone who ordered already has a module waiting here. Well, if anyone is tired of waiting for their module, please contact me, and I'll buy it from you... Thanks... -- -Doug http://www.analognotes.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

PSIM-1 Update

2005-02-04 by synthmodules

Thanks Scott. Yes, everyone who ordered already has a module waiting here. They are just in parts... waiting to be finished. This coming Sunday I'm having a "PSIM-1 building gathering"... and hope to make *significant* progress. I'll update everyone on the progress made at that p

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Somewhat absurd

2005-02-03 by Scott E.

Hang in there, Brice. I know it has been a long time for many of us, but I am confident that you will have product for every one that ordered. Scott Evans ========================================================================= Brice D. Hornback wrote: > As a side note.... I hav

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Somewhat absurd

2005-02-03 by Brice D. Hornback

As a side note.... I have two people coming over the next two Sundays to help me finish stuffing parts. So, progress should speed up rapidly now. There's more to it (why it's taking so long)... and I'll fill in the details as I can. More later... late for work... - Brice ----- Or

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Somewhat absurd

2005-02-03 by Brice D. Hornback

Larry, I am about 20% completed on all the remaining modules. Progress has been slow for many reasons... but progress is being made. I know everyone has been extremely patient... and I thank everyone for that. Progress IS being made... although slowly. Like I said in a previous p

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Somewhat absurd

2005-02-03 by pluplurfect

I have waited, rather patiently, I think, for nearly a year. At this point I am going to have to concur with Larry and ask the same question. Late last April (two months after I paid), I was told in reply to my inquiry regarding shipping dates that there were twelve modules ahead

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Somewhat absurd

2005-02-03 by Tone

Has *anyone* received a PSIM-1 in the past 6 months? --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "mrboningen" wrote: > > agreed. more news please brice. > > --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > > Well, I am getting no answers to my private e-mail, so here goes in >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Somewhat absurd

2005-02-02 by ac

well said that man! i don't think we're being unreasonable asking for a little communication. On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:48:22 -0800 (PST), Larry Hendry wrote: > > Well, I am getting no answers to my private e-mail, so here goes in > public..... > > Brice, What is going on? We have a

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: Somewhat absurd

2005-02-02 by analog@devilkitty.org

I have been patient, but must finally speak up and concur with Larry. I wrote last *April* and was told that there were twelve more to be built before mine. Still haven't got it. Assuming (and I think that at this point it's by no means a *safe* assumption) mine's next, that work

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Somewhat absurd

2005-02-02 by mrboningen

agreed. more news please brice. --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > Well, I am getting no answers to my private e-mail, so here goes in > public..... > > Brice, What is going on? We have a right to know because you have > been paid. If you look at the past

Thread view Attachments: 0

Somewhat absurd

2005-02-02 by Larry Hendry

Well, I am getting no answers to my private e-mail, so here goes in public..... Brice, What is going on? We have a right to know because you have been paid. If you look at the past e-mails, people are asking for information. I'm not talking about lame, short answers like "things

Thread view Attachments: 0

min-max program uploaded

2005-01-28 by djbrow54

Just a quick little program that limits two input CV voltages to between two other input voltages (e.g. a minimum and a maximum limit). I provide the limited output voltage and also a quantized voltage output for each input. In my DJB programs folder. Dave

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-26 by Larry Hendry

--- grantrichter2001 wrote: > Here is a quote: "I used to be able to carry 10 times more than I > could afford, now it's the other way around." That's a great quote Grant. I can assure that in my last gigging out band (this one was a duo), I ALWAYS considered weight as one of the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-26 by Mike Marsh

Mine never leaves the studio AND it doesn't hiss! --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry wrote: > --- grantrichter2001 wrote: > > Here is a quote: "I used to be able to carry 10 times more than I > > could afford, now it's the other way around." > > That's a great quot

Thread view Attachments: 0

Spec benchmark myths

2005-01-25 by Gary Chang

I hope that this doesn't seem too far OT, but I have been biting my tongue through this discussion about specs, and thought that I would toss a few observations out.... 1). Although the mathematical dynamic range (not signal-to-noise) of CD players is 96db (16 bits x 6db = 96db),

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-25 by grantrichter2001

I should clarify that, by comical, I mean "You expect me to pick THAT up, with MY bad back????". NOT that there is anything comical about people who like large format systems, make them or use them. OK? --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "grantrichter2001" wrote: > > I think th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-25 by grantrichter2001

I think the point of the whole discussion is that using unscientific terms like signal to noise ratio is misleading. The only way you can really tell anything about a synth is to buy it. And the one you like today may be different from what one you like 10 or 20 years from now, a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by Mike Marsh

All very interesting indeed. But when one analog modular synth adds achingly audible hiss to my recordings and others do not, I dump the noisy one...rightly or wrongly, I guess! Mike --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "grantrichter2001" wrote: > > My personal feeling is that ca

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by grantrichter2001

My personal feeling is that calculating SNR and THD from a 24 bit FFT is more accurate than a voltmeter. The FFT shows you its own error contribution, where the voltmeter does not. Everybody uses a different method, there is hardly any way to compare such specifications accuratel

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by john mahoney

> It might be useful to note that signal to noise ratio is different > than the noise floor. The noise floor is the actual hiss (thermal > noise). Thanks for clarifying that, Grant! (I had my doubts when I posted it, but that didn't stop me. ;-) I was poking around the Bergfotron

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by grantrichter2001

My reference is the Spectralab software which calulates it from the FFT. About.com defines signal to noise ratio this way: http://stereos.about.com/cs/glossaryandtools/g/sn_ratio.htm --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "Scott E." wrote: > Grant, > > I would respectfully disagree

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by Scott E.

Now that is interesting. I will have to try this. I know that one has to be careful about mixing analog and digital circuits to the supplies, but if the VCOs and the VCAs segregated make that much of a difference, it would certainly be an audible one and worth the time to perform

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by Scott E.

Grant, I would respectfully disagree with your definition of signal to noise ratio. The inclusion of the second order harmonic is only appropriate for determining the THD of the circuit when a signal is applied, whether that be steady state or transient. The definition of signal

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by grantrichter2001

--- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "grantrichter2001" wrote: > > > Quality? Let's look at signal-to-noise. According to the > Synthsizers.com > > FAQ, the dotcom VCA has "a signal to noise ratio of 82db (CD > quality is > > around 96db)." The MOTM-190 has a dynamic range of "be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-21 by grantrichter2001

> Quality? Let's look at signal-to-noise. According to the Synthsizers.com > FAQ, the dotcom VCA has "a signal to noise ratio of 82db (CD quality is > around 96db)." The MOTM-190 has a dynamic range of "better than 100dB." > That's a very big difference. It might be useful to not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-20 by Mike Marsh

This is a very good point: also consider Wiard, Cyndustries, and CGS. I hear tell ModCan ain't bad either! :) Mike Happy MOTM, Oakley, Blacet, Cyndustries, CGS, Encore, Stooge Synths owner (mostly all MOTM format). --- In SynthModules@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Scheidler" wrote: >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-19 by Larry Hendry

--- Mubo wrote: > im getting ready to start on my modular...and in doing so i have > taken notice of the difference in price between the MOTM kits and > the synth.com units. > > are the MOTM units really that much better? ... --LH-- First let me say that the dot com modules are f

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SynthModules] Re: MOTM or Synthesizers.com ???

2005-01-19 by Doug Wellington

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:06:01 -0500, Andrew Scheidler wrote: > Not to dissuade you from either MOTM or .com, but whatever your criteria > I think Blacet is also worthy of consideration. Definitely! I have a combination of Blacet and MOTM, and they go very well together... You can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.