Yahoo Groups archive

SergeModular

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:13 UTC

Thread

Sync on Serge

Sync on Serge

2003-02-10 by jan-hinnerk.helms@t-online.de

Thanks to Chris, John and Blake for filling me up regarding CV
attenuation and CVI details. But as you can imagine, I still have some
questions left (ah...what a surprise):

According to the catalogue, the NTO and PCO have sync capabilties. As I
understand it, this is a dedicated “soft sync” input (allowing to
beating-free lock the sync’ed oscillator’s frequency to any
harmonic/fundamental/sub-harmonic of the syncing oscillator), but it
does not allow for “hard sync” (resetting the sync’ed oscillator’s
waveform whenever the synching oscillator has a reset, normally the
rising edge of a square wave is used as the reset signal, see
http://www.csounds.com/ezine/sync/ for a nice picture of hard sync).

I asked Rex about modifying the NTO/PCO for hard sync. He answered that
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hard sync is not available on the [PCO] or [NTO] -- you use the 'SIG"
> input jack(s) on the [DSG]s to perform the operation.

So he refered to the "how to hard-sync using a DSG" section of the STS
catalogue. In case you don't have it at hand, I'll quote:

[QUOTE]
Sub-Harmonic Series Generator (Divider). If a series of triggers are
applied to the TRIG IN jack that are faster than the total rise plus
fall time, then the unit will divide the incoming triggers by a whole
number.
[SNIP]
If the Slope Generators are set to audio frequencies, and the incoming
triggers are in the audio range, then the output will be the
sub-harmonic series. This is similar to the "hard sync" sound found in
other synthesizers (and is the main reason that it is not included on
Serge VCO's).
[UNQUOTE]

When I visited George Miller and his Blue Fun Station, we checked this
out, result: the sound of the subharmonic series is NOT similar to a
hard sync sound.

How is this? Did I miss something? Is the passage in the catalogue
wrong? Is asking this question bordering on being blasphemous ;-) ? And
am I alone with the wish to hear NTOs and PCOs hard-synced?

Confused regards
Jan-Hinnerk

Re: Sync on Serge

2003-02-10 by John Papiewski

On the DSG - the subharmonic thing is not similar to hard sync but the
sound you get as the DSG tracks the osc you're syncing to is.

And yes, I think the PCO/NTO lacking hard sync is unfortunate. There
are many ways to achieve hard sync, but I don't know if this can be
done to the existing design without ripping some sensitive stuff out of
the design. In other words, it must be hard to do this to the existing
nto/pco.

So to get osc with hard sync you have to look at someone elses' gear.


jan-hinnerk.helms@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Thanks to Chris, John and Blake for filling me up regarding CV
> attenuation and CVI details. But as you can imagine, I still have some
> questions left (ah...what a surprise):
>
> According to the catalogue, the NTO and PCO have sync capabilties. As I
> understand it, this is a dedicated “soft sync” input (allowing to
> beating-free lock the sync’ed oscillator’s frequency to any
> harmonic/fundamental/sub-harmonic of the syncing oscillator), but it
> does not allow for “hard sync” (resetting the sync’ed oscillator’s
> waveform whenever the synching oscillator has a reset, normally the
> rising edge of a square wave is used as the reset signal, see
> http://www.csounds.com/ezine/sync/ for a nice picture of hard sync).
>
> I asked Rex about modifying the NTO/PCO for hard sync. He answered that
>
> Hard sync is not available on the [PCO] or [NTO] -- you use the
> 'SIG" input jack(s) on the [DSG]s to perform the operation.
>
>
> So he refered to the "how to hard-sync using a DSG" section of the STS
> catalogue. In case you don't have it at hand, I'll quote:
>
> [QUOTE]
> Sub-Harmonic Series Generator (Divider). If a series of triggers are
> applied to the TRIG IN jack that are faster than the total rise plus
> fall time, then the unit will divide the incoming triggers by a whole
> number.
> [SNIP]
> If the Slope Generators are set to audio frequencies, and the incoming
> triggers are in the audio range, then the output will be the
> sub-harmonic series. This is similar to the "hard sync" sound found in
> other synthesizers (and is the main reason that it is not included on
> Serge VCO's).
> [UNQUOTE]
>
> When I visited George Miller and his Blue Fun Station, we checked this
> out, result: the sound of the subharmonic series is NOT similar to a
> hard sync sound.
>
> How is this? Did I miss something? Is the passage in the catalogue
> wrong? Is asking this question bordering on being blasphemous ;-) ? And
> am I alone with the wish to hear NTOs and PCOs hard-synced?
>
> Confused regards
> Jan-Hinnerk

Re: Sync on Serge

2003-02-10 by Chris Whitten

OK to be devils advocate for one minute.....
This is getting like Meg Ryan's food ordering in 'When Harry Met Sally'.
You either buy in to the Serge philosophy warts and all, or you look
elsewhere. There are lots of oscillators that hard sync, not so many with
continuous voltage controlled waveshaping.
It's a crass example I know.....I guess to quote another cliché, you can't
please all of the people all of the time. So like it or lump it.

Re: Sync on Serge

2003-02-10 by metafoetus2002 <jan-hinnerk.helms@t-onli

Hi Chris,

thanks for playing the devil's advocate. You are of course right with "take=
it or
leave it". But given the fact that the Serge is a hand-made instrument I th=
ink it
is quite legitime to ask for modifications.

The pain in my brain - the reason for my original post - came from the fact=
that
I know the sound of the subharmonic series and I know the sound of hard
sync, both sweeped and static: They sound different, they look different - =
and
yet I have a catalogue in my hand saying that they are similar. This puzzle=
d
me, and I wanted to know if this came from my lack of understanding.

Furthermore, given the - at least for my geographical position - limited
possibility to test a Serge before spending a considerable amount of money,=
I
like to know its "warts" beforehand and ask if these are aquired or innate.=

Over time one might even get to love the "warts" of his partner, but it's b=
etter to
discover these before…

…or why else do you think it took Harry and Sally such a long time to final=
ly
get together?

:-)

Best regards
Jan-Hinnerk
Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, Chris Whitten <cw.chris@z...> wrote:
> OK to be devils advocate for one minute.....
> This is getting like Meg Ryan's food ordering in 'When Harry Met Sally'.
> You either buy in to the Serge philosophy warts and all, or you look
> elsewhere. There are lots of oscillators that hard sync, not so many with=

> continuous voltage controlled waveshaping.
> It's a crass example I know.....I guess to quote another cliché, you can'=
t
> please all of the people all of the time. So like it or lump it.

Re: Sync on Serge

2003-02-12 by echowind73 <echowind73@yahoo.com>

--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, jan-hinnerk.helms@t... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Thanks to Chris, John and Blake for filling me up regarding CV
> attenuation and CVI details. But as you can imagine, I still have some
> questions left (ah...what a surprise):
>
> According to the catalogue, the NTO and PCO have sync capabilties. As I
> understand it, this is a dedicated "soft sync" input (allowing to
> beating-free lock the sync'ed oscillator's frequency to any
> harmonic/fundamental/sub-harmonic of the syncing oscillator), but it
> does not allow for "hard sync" (resetting the sync'ed oscillator's
> waveform whenever the synching oscillator has a reset, normally the
> rising edge of a square wave is used as the reset signal, see
> http://www.csounds.com/ezine/sync/ for a nice picture of hard sync).
>
> I asked Rex about modifying the NTO/PCO for hard sync. He answered that
>
> > Hard sync is not available on the [PCO] or [NTO] -- you use the 'SIG"
> > input jack(s) on the [DSG]s to perform the operation.
>
> So he refered to the "how to hard-sync using a DSG" section of the STS
> catalogue. In case you don't have it at hand, I'll quote:
>
> [QUOTE]
> Sub-Harmonic Series Generator (Divider). If a series of triggers are
> applied to the TRIG IN jack that are faster than the total rise plus
> fall time, then the unit will divide the incoming triggers by a whole
> number.
> [SNIP]
> If the Slope Generators are set to audio frequencies, and the incoming
> triggers are in the audio range, then the output will be the
> sub-harmonic series. This is similar to the "hard sync" sound found in
> other synthesizers (and is the main reason that it is not included on
> Serge VCO's).
> [UNQUOTE]
>
> When I visited George Miller and his Blue Fun Station, we checked this
> out, result: the sound of the subharmonic series is NOT similar to a
> hard sync sound.
>

OK... the above approach is NOT the best way to achieve it, because at
the highest DSG frequencies sometimes the feedback loop stops
oscillating. This has always happened on all four of my DSG's, and is
a pain because you have to manually repatch to start the system
oscillating again. You need to do conceptually the same patch but
instead of patching the gate output to the gate input, patch the audio
output through a comparator (NCOM) and back into the gate input...I
forgot the exact patch but I will set it up tonight and post it tomorrow.

Another tip is the DSG input, which is the master oscillator, cannot
have a DC bias, so use the "sine" output of the PCO/NTO or the square
output of the NTO.

Anyway, you can get interesting results though. Another drawback is
the DSG has a max. frequency of around 5000 Hz, ideally you want the
slave oscillator to have a higher range than the master osc.

I would love for my NTO/PCO's to be modded to accept hard sync, to get
around all these problems, and to not require so many modules to
achieve a simple hard sync patch.

--Harvey

Re: Sync on Serge

2003-02-13 by echowind73 <echowind73@yahoo.com>

[...]
> You need to do conceptually the same patch but
> instead of patching the gate output to the gate input, patch the audio
> output through a comparator (NCOM) and back into the gate input...I
> forgot the exact patch but I will set it up tonight and post it
tomorrow.

OK here is the patch. the NTO is the "master", the DSG "slave":

NTO square out -> DSG in
DSG out -> NCOM "-" in
NCOM out -> DSG Trig in

"NCOM out" is the main (lower) output, not the divided one.
The system output is also taken from here.

Adjust the NCOM bias knob to about the "+2" position to improve the
tone, making it less raspy. You should increase the bias as much as
possible before the system begins to stutter and lose sync.

Any waveform may replace the NTO square, as long as its DC bias is
zero. Hence any of the NTO variable waveforms will work as well as
the sine or PCO sine. The square seems to give best results.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.