wave multiplier panel @ FPE
2003-04-09 by Jeffrey Pontius

Yahoo Groups archive
Archive for ModularSynthPanels.
Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:07 UTC
Thread
2003-04-09 by Jeffrey Pontius
2003-04-21 by Larry Hendry
2003-04-21 by sasami@hotkey.net.au
>Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there would beAt least I am adopting some standards now :) I'm doing my boards 6" tall,
>no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting space would be
>large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do not fit on
>my normal brackets). And, they would of course conform to the normal
>MOTM statdards. This would be a 3 pot bracket.
2003-04-21 by Jeffrey Pontius
> I am thinking af making a new bracket. Todd has asked me to makeA nice idea, and I'm sure some people could make good use of them.
> these available. It would be the same depth as my 3 pot and 4 pot
> short brackets. However, the back 2 1/2 inches of the bracket would
> be at least 6 inches tall. This would go behind any pots, switches,
> or jacks on the front of the panels leaving almost 2 inches of space
> for mounting stuff in front of the bracket.
>
> Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there would beNote: I did use a small 4-pot Stooge bracket to mount the Steiner pcb by
> no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting space would be
> large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do not fit on
> my normal brackets).
2003-04-21 by gareII@aol.com
2003-04-21 by Scott Deyo
>From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: motmpanels@yahoogroups.com
>To: motmpanels@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [motmpanels] Any CGS bracket interest
>Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:46:35 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Larry,
> > I am thinking af making a new bracket. Todd has asked me to make
> > these available. It would be the same depth as my 3 pot and 4 pot
> > short brackets. However, the back 2 1/2 inches of the bracket would
> > be at least 6 inches tall. This would go behind any pots, switches,
> > or jacks on the front of the panels leaving almost 2 inches of space
> > for mounting stuff in front of the bracket.
> >
>A nice idea, and I'm sure some people could make good use of them.
>However, to be honest (and Ken S. or others can disagreed with me), given
>the 10 (about) CGS modules that I have currently mounted onto front
>panels, I used Stooge pcb brackets on 2 modules (wave mult. & Steiner
>filter). The other modules (e.g., gated comparator, pulse div./logic,
>dual asr) are (mostly) Switchcraft sockets, so the pot-based Stooge
>brackets would have to be modified for securing to sockets. I just custom
>cut some pcb brackets (not nearly as nice as Stooges, but they are
>functional).
>
> > Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there would be
> > no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting space would be
> > large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do not fit on
> > my normal brackets).
>
>Note: I did use a small 4-pot Stooge bracket to mount the Steiner pcb by
>orienting the narrow pcb from the corner to diagonal corner, and removing
>the portion of the bracket containing the lowest pot hole. Also room for
>a CGS small dc mixer to mix frequency and input cv attenuation.
>
>Just $.02, Jeff
>
2003-04-21 by Bob
> I have one of Ken Stones PCBs and know of others how havebeen
> recently building these into their MOTM / Oakley formatsystems. I
> find that my PCB is long and skinny compared to the Oakly /MOTM /
> Blacet formats.too
>
> In fact, on the Wave Multiplier PCB I have, the 6 inch length, is
> long running up and down for even my wide 4 pot bracket.make
>
> So, anyhow here is my question....
>
> I am thinking af making a new bracket. Todd has asked me to
> these available. It would be the same depth as my 3 pot and 4pot
> short brackets. However, the back 2 1/2 inches of the bracketwould
> be at least 6 inches tall. This would go behind any pots,switches,
> or jacks on the front of the panels leaving almost 2 inches ofspace
> for mounting stuff in front of the bracket.would be
>
> Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there
> no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting spacewould be
> large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do notfit on
> my normal brackets). And, they would of course conform to thenormal
> MOTM statdards. This would be a 3 pot bracket.__________________________________________________
>
> Any interest in these brackets?
> Larry Hendry
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> http://search.yahoo.com
2003-04-21 by Larry Hendry
> At least I am adopting some standards now :) I'm doing my boards__________________________________________________
> 6" tall, and 1, 2 or 3" wide. Some of the older boards will be
> reworked to these standards too. Why 6" x 1" increments? Because
> this is the standard used in Serge boards, and I have a lot of
> Serge form-factor stuff here.
> Ken
2003-04-22 by sasami@hotkey.net.au
>2. I can put PCB mounting holes (see Ken's note below) to accomodateThe holes are 0.15" in from the edges (top, bottom and sides) of the board
>1, 2 and 3" wide PCBs, assuming the hole placement from the edges is
>consistent. Those mounting some of the older PCBs would have to
>drill their own holes if they did choose to use these brackets.