Hi Morbius, If that's your $.02, I'll throw in a dollar to hear more! It's really good to know the biz side of things, and how other places do it. How hard is it to have a nice textured paint finish (like DotCom, for instance ;) on an engraved panel? That's my biggest beef w/ FPE -- they just look so flat, and scratch easily. Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechamber.com www.bridechamber.com On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:44 PM, ~Morbius~ wrote: > Just as an info kinda thing.... Having been an engraver and working > in the sign biz for since the 80's, I can tell you that > reverse-engraving (or front engraving) and paint-filling (or spraying) > is going to be more expensive since it is so much more > labor-intensive. I had, at one time, considered reverse-engraving > either plexi, or lexan... and illuminating it either from the side(s) > or the back. The rear is painted black, and the graphics are painted > whatever color you want (or use colored a light-source and leave the > engraved clear)... That makes all of the text, graphics, and tickmarks > light-up (and looks very impressive). When I was in Nashville, I > worked at a sign company which did all of the engraving work and > awards for the Country Music Awards.... Opryland... all of the big > hotels.... and our engraving department was the largest department in > the whole place, with 5 fulltime engravers working 5 days a week, 9 > hours a day. We built a lot of stuff from scratch in plexi and lexan, > and had every type of equipment needed... from plainers to routing > tables... from acetylene torches to 'weld-on' (plexi glue) and > paint-booths. Like most things, you get what you pay for... and if you > go with 'cheap', it's gonna look 'cheap'. > > A much cheaper way would be to have the 'dial' (with the tickmark > calibration) printed onto adhesive vinyl. But here again, quantities > are really needed to make it cost effective. Where it can be printed > more cheaply on a Fargo or any large-format printer... cutting-out the > 'stickers' becomes the issue. There are a few large-format printers > which are also plotter/cutters... and they can do the entire operation > from the file. But- it's still a matter of 'do you want 'stickers... > or silkscreened, or engraved'? The 'look' one wants, is gonna have > everthing to do with the cost... just like the quantity is going to > affect the price... (or price per unit). > > Laser-engraving is the way to go with many materials. And usually, > besides the laser doing the engraving, it also cuts-out each unit from > the material blanks. > Making the tickmarks is no big deal... that is, with the proper > software. I know that CasMate and Flexi Sign are both used for > engraving, vinyl-cutting, and large-format printing... and both do > vector-graphics, and generate all sorts of dials, rulers, calibration > and tickmarks... and all you do is select the option you want in the > drop-drown menu, then, assign the variables... size of the dial, > thickness of the strokes, depth, how many, numbers or characters and > where you want them... etc. But like silkscreening... it's the first > layout that takes a little time designing. After that, you're just > pulling-up a file and reproducing it, or editing it. > > Just my $02/100 > I'll shut-up now. : | > > ~Morbius~ >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Scott Deyo >> To: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:10 PM >> Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels] saving money with tickmark discs >> >> That's cool. I didn't know about that. I just saw Dave's CVS module >> -- crazy! I love it! >> >> I can't legally use fpd files, though I think I can view them and go >> from there. But they did make the software, and it's very handy >> indeed. It's a morally gray area :) >> >> Scott Deyo >> The Bridechamber >> contact@... >> www.bridechamber.com >> >> >> On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:50 PM, xamboldt wrote: >> >>> If you use HPGL to make the tick marks, it saves some money. I >>> believe you can find some example fpd files on Dave Brown's site. >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:21 PM, David Griffith wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > It seems to me that making tickmarks around pots is one of those >>> > things >>> > that really add to the cost of panels. Suppose you make up a bunch >>> of >>> > thin discs with tickmarks on them and use those instead of putting >>> > tickmarks directly on the panels. Would this be cheaper? Would it >>> look >>> > or feel ugly? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > David Griffith >>> > dgriffi@....edu >>> > >>> > >>> > >
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: saving money with tickmark discs
2007-09-28 by Scott Deyo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.