So how close do people want? I should probably make sure before I get
the next 30 designs silkscreened! :)
I was of the mind that if I made the same format panels that were
very close to MOTM in looks, and were of high quality, that would be
great.
Other reasons I didn't want to match 100%:
I'm not MOTM.
I'll never get to 100% unless I get the exact tickmark graphic.
Stooges were not 100%, I thought.
MOTM is not 100%! From the first modules I bought to the last, there
is variation in tickmark design. There is also inconsistency in jack
labeling (above or below).
Honestly, I like my variation better. I think it's more legible, and
less... gothic or something.
You should have seen the orange panels I wanted to do ;p
Seriously, though, I'd like to know how close people want me to get,
and if there's a problem with me not being close enough. I don't know
if people don't tell me.
Cheers,
Scott
contact@bridechamber.com
www.bridechamber.com
--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jay ...> wrote:
>
> xamboldt wrote:
>
> > I would, although I'd weigh the cost vs. Bridechamber panels...
>
> But the Bridechamber panels don't match Paul's graphics. Some
people are
> picky.
>
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: Stooge Panels?
2006-11-20 by Scott K Warren
Yes, this is being picky. I know many people are less picky, or even prefer variation. I can see how some people may like the BrideChamber style better. That's fine. This is just me.
skw
On Nov 19, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Scott Deyo wrote: