Not a problem. Variation is good. Even pots off the MOTM grid are preferable (like the Oakley little-lag fpe design). Hans --- Scott Deyo <contact@...> wrote: > > So how close do people want? I should probably make > sure before I get > the next 30 designs silkscreened! :) > I was of the mind that if I made the same format > panels that were > very close to MOTM in looks, and were of high > quality, that would be > great. > > Other reasons I didn't want to match 100%: > I'm not MOTM. > I'll never get to 100% unless I get the exact > tickmark graphic. > Stooges were not 100%, I thought. > MOTM is not 100%! From the first modules I bought to > the last, there > is variation in tickmark design. There is also > inconsistency in jack > labeling (above or below). > Honestly, I like my variation better. I think it's > more legible, and > less... gothic or something. > > You should have seen the orange panels I wanted to > do ;p > > Seriously, though, I'd like to know how close people > want me to get, > and if there's a problem with me not being close > enough. I don't know > if people don't tell me. > > Cheers, > Scott > contact@... > www.bridechamber.com > > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jay > <synthbaron@...> wrote: > > > > xamboldt wrote: > > > > > I would, although I'd weigh the cost vs. > Bridechamber panels... > > > > But the Bridechamber panels don't match Paul's > graphics. Some > people are > > picky. > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail beta Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Message
[ModularSynthPanels] Re: Stooge Panels?
2006-11-19 by > angelzero <
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
