Yes, very nice to be able to compare. Thanks! Anyone care if we switch to .2mm? Scott --- In motmpanels@y..., Charles Stella <scelectronics@e...> wrote: > > Wow cool! If you look at the photo in the upper right hand corner you can > see the Oakley EFG on the left and the Oakley Phaser on the right. The EFG > is .4mm and the Phaser is .2mm. Thanks John! > > There are closeup photos of these panels here: > > http://www.retrosynth.com/slideshow/baah02/ > > John Loffink > jloffink@a... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Evans, Gen Mgr [mailto:esresource@e...] > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:40 PM > > To: motmpanels@y... > > Subject: Re: [motmpanels] Hello > > > > Hello, > > > > I just saw both examples on Charles' MOTM last Saturday and would > concur > > with his assessment that the .2mm is easier to read. > > > > My .02 > > > > Scott > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > motmpanels-unsubscribe@y... > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
Message
Re: Hello
2002-10-22 by tsomneevich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.