Why not make the bands vertical instead of horizontal? That layout would make more sense to me. On Aug 27, 2009, at 7:17 AM, wjhall11 wrote: > Despite JH's PCB design that allows for "linking" more than one PCB > together in tandem, I can't see enough benefit in doing so to > warrant a panel specially designed for it. In fact, having two > separate resonators have distinct advantages. Dad and I will build > two such ones. > > Ken Eldhardt, in an Electro-music post, says "About number of bands > and overlap. First keep in mind for comparison that the Polyfusion > formant filter only has bandpass filters, and covers a more limited > range than the Moog. For acoustic instrument formants, the bands > work well. If an instrument has two predominant formant peaks, they > always seem to fall into two different Moog bands, so Moog picked > the frequencies well. Having a 6 band filter bank where the > additional 3 are offset a bit for overlap doesn't really get you > anything. Running two resonators in parallel to give you 6 bands > means you're going to have plenty of overlap. You'll have 2 filters > for each range, so there's not much of a need to change frequencies. > And there's nothing about the 7.5K range that needs fine tonal > control anyway. In addition, I mentioned to JH, that the more bands > you use, the more you water down the result. I usually find that I > only need one or at most two filters beyond the normal lowpass > already in the synth I'd be running through it." > > Having two separate resonators, then, actually addresses the purpose > of gaining additional bands. In addition, though, separate > resonators could be used for stereo processing, for having different > mode settings, for running in parallel - in series - for different > voices. > > So I set out to design a panel for a "single" three-band resonator. > This design is preliminary. I guessed at the features based on the > photos of JH's prototype, but I think I've taken good guesses. > Having a direct-through DRY OUT jack (just hot-wired to the IN jack) > would serve for joining two (or more) of the resonators when required. > > Bottom line: it fits in 3U. > > URL to image: http://www.dragonflyalley.com/images/JHpolymoogResonator/JHPolymoogResV1vIIwidth1-92in.jpg > > How does it look? I see areas for possible improvement. > > Will (and Bill) > > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd \ufffd \ufffd
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] JH Polymoog Resonator Panel
2009-08-27 by Jeff Laity
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.