It looks like I am about to get on the short bus with the Ills. One of the most important parts of the synthi type oscillator is the interactive tuneability unlike any 3 oscillator network. Room to set the parameters is a good thing and multiturn verniers and 24 mm pots across the panel is they type of room I would invest in . gino > It seems to Will and I that the only real advantage, aside from less expense, of building the LVCO without vernier (counting) dials appears to be taking up a little less space - we found counting dials that are only a little bigger than the standard MOTM TYCOs. But taking up less space looks to us like it isn't very useful because, assuming you include all of them, we can't see a way to possibly fit the controls into fewer than 4 Units. > > The big advantage of the verniers, of course, is the counting. The intended Frequency pots are fancy, 10-turn units, and we figure it will be good to have a read-out of the turn. > > The four-unit LVCO panel assumes really, really dinky pots for a bunch of the other controls. If you want to avoid the super-dinky pots, you move into the 5-Unit design which uses the semi-dinky knobs - the ones that appear on lots of Tellun designs. Then there's no real reason to use the small counting dials 'cause there's space for the bigger ones. > > But then there's the completely stupid 7U design... ahem... <shuffles his feet> <looks at the ceiling> > > We ordered up verniers from Mouser a few days ago... so maybe this note is just the beginning of a huge rationalization for allowing my OCD to run rampant as we stagger toward implementing the 7U design. > > <shrug> > > > > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Laity <synthetic@> wrote: > > > > Any update on this panel? I vote for a version without verniers if > > possible. > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:30 PM, Scott Deyo wrote: > > > > > I'm doing something, but I'm not sure what yet. Maybe a poll will > > > happen, but not for a little while yet.... > > > > > > Scott Deyo > > > The Bridechamber > > > contact@ > > > http://www.bridechamber.com > > > Jealous Edison Record Kompany > > > http://www.jealousedison.com > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jan-Ahrent Czmok wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 27.05.2009, at 04:18, Scott Deyo wrote: > > >> > > >>> The 'ills have some designs they've been working on: > > >>> http://dragonflyalley.com/constructionJHLivingVCO.htm > > >>> > > >>> Scott Deyo > > >> Will you do a panel run for this design ? i got the living vco kit > > >> with the verniers and really like the design.. > > >> > > >> --jan > > >> > > >> > > > > > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Living VCO
2009-08-13 by adaaxs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.