Modular Synth Panels group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Modular Synth Panels

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:10 UTC

Message

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Klee panel E-M royalty

2009-04-06 by Scott K Warren

James, royalties don't automagically "kick in" due to someone's use in  
a for-profit business.  A royalty obligation arises only if the owner  
of the intellectual property requires it in his terms of use, and of  
course only the owner could so require.

E-M does not own the Thomas White elliptical panel design, and so has  
no right to require a royalty.

As Bill said, if Thomas White wanted a royalty he would be entitled to  
it, and I doubt any of us would begrudge it. (But if Mr. White does,  
he should speak up soon!)

skw


On Apr 6, 2009, at 3:31 PM, JAMES GALLANT wrote:

> Please feel free to correct me if I am incorrect in any of the  
> following.
>
> Anyone can make a panel for their own use without royalty.
>
> T. White's rotary design is an FPD file that can be found in the  
> files section of this group and is for purchasing a professional  
> quality panel from Front Panel Express - Schafer.
>
> T. White has given permission to Bridechamber for use of this design  
> for a run of panels.  These will presumably be painted and screened  
> and therefore somewhat different in appearance from the FPD panels.   
> There may be some other tweaks too.
>
> S. Stites did the actual design of the Klee circuitry and I assume  
> that he (or E-M) own the rights to the Klee name and that E-M dot  
> com is the only authorized source for the PCB's.
>
> It is my understanding that the panel royalty kicks in due to the  
> fact that Bridechamber is a for profit business which takes him  
> outside of the personal use arena.  Therefore Mr. Deyo needs and  
> deserves to get something in return for his time and trouble beyond  
> all of the thanks and praise that we heap upon him.  As a result,  
> since Scott D. will make (a tiny amount of) money off of this  
> effort, it follows that Scott S. (aka E-M) who is the owner of the  
> source intellectual property should reap some benefit too.
>
> Just my thoughts, which could be wrong.
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
> To: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com
> From: jason@...
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:04:58 -0700
> Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Klee panel E-M royalty
>
> IMHO, the royalties for the Klee are paid when you buy the PCB.
> that's where the bottleneck is and should be.
>
> however, if people are willing to include a little extra for
> electro-music, then fair enough, but that should be an optional extra
> when you buy your panel. a little like funding campaign stuff from
> your taxes (ooh, topical).
>
> >That's what I was thinking too. Haven't others made panels for
> >their Klees? Are they expected to pay EM as well?
> >
> >-=john
>
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.