On 6 apr 2009, at 21:29, Chris Muir wrote: > On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Scott Deyo wrote: > >> General discussion of the royalty is OK, too, but... Probably >> everyone >> will be more than happy to support E-M > > > E-M deserves support, no doubt, but a 20% surcharge on a panel is a > bit steep, IMO. Licensing fees are rarely this high in the "real > world." I agree. I'm all for supporting E-M but 20% seems a tad high. And isn't the design done by Thomas White? Shouldn't he share in the royalties too? Anyway, if this is the deal, then I'm still in. Need panel. Ben
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Klee panel E-M royalty
2009-04-06 by Ben Stuyts