Modular Synth Panels

Sending again, as this didn't seem to get posted.

Richard Brewster wrote:
> For this application I want to use passive simple attenuators.  I 
> already have two Oakley Multi-Mix and two Blacet Mixers with 
> reversible, center-off, active attenuators.  These lack the simplicity 
> of a pot that just goes from zero to 100 percent.  I have a number of 
> non-attenuated CV inputs on various modules where I'd just like to 
> patch a passive attenuator.
>
> Richard Brewster
> http://www.pugix.com
>
> David Moylan wrote:
>> I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful?  Could 
>> probably be done with an MUUB.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Scott Deyo wrote:
>>> That could easily be done, but they'll have to wait a bit until the 
>>> current run is finished and paid for.
>>>
>>> Good idea!
>>>
>>> I was also planning on making one for DotCom cabinets, a partial 
>>> width for all those MOTMers using DotCom cabs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Scott Deyo
>>> The Bridechamber
>>> contact@...
>>> http://www.bridechamber.com
>>> Jealous Edison Record Kompany
>>> http://www.jealousedison.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Richard Brewster wrote:
>>>
>>>     I've realized that I could use some passive attenuators. Just 100K
>>>     linear pots wired to jacks for in and out. Three could fit on a 1U
>>>     MOTM-format panel in the same configuration as an Oakley
>>>     Multi-Mix. I
>>>     can easily make a FPE panel design for this, but wouldn't this be
>>>     a nice
>>>     addition to Bridechamber?
>>>
>>>     Thoughts?
>>>
>>>     -Richard Brewster
>>>     http://www.pugix.com
>>>