For this application I want to use passive simple attenuators. I already have two Oakley Multi-Mix and two Blacet Mixers with reversible, center-off, active attenuators. These lack the simplicity of a pot that just goes from zero to 100 percent. I have a number of non-attenuated CV inputs on various modules where I'd just like to patch a passive attenuator. Richard Brewster http://www.pugix.com David Moylan wrote: > I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful? Could > probably be done with an MUUB. > > Dave > > Scott Deyo wrote: >> That could easily be done, but they'll have to wait a bit until the >> current run is finished and paid for. >> >> Good idea! >> >> I was also planning on making one for DotCom cabinets, a partial >> width for all those MOTMers using DotCom cabs. >> >> Cheers, >> Scott Deyo >> The Bridechamber >> contact@... >> http://www.bridechamber.com >> Jealous Edison Record Kompany >> http://www.jealousedison.com >> >> >> On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Richard Brewster wrote: >> >> I've realized that I could use some passive attenuators. Just 100K >> linear pots wired to jacks for in and out. Three could fit on a 1U >> MOTM-format panel in the same configuration as an Oakley >> Multi-Mix. I >> can easily make a FPE panel design for this, but wouldn't this be >> a nice >> addition to Bridechamber? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Richard Brewster >> http://www.pugix.com >> > >
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] 1U MOTM panel for three passive attenuators
2009-01-29 by Richard Brewster