I could leave the tick-marks unlabeled and you could build it either way -- no 0 to 10, or -5 to +5. Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechamber.com http://www.bridechamber.com Jealous Edison Record Kompany http://www.jealousedison.com On Jan 28, 2009, at 8:38 AM, David Moylan wrote: > I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful? Could > probably be done with an MUUB. > > Dave > > Scott Deyo wrote:That could easily be done, but they'll have to wait > a bit until the current run is finished and paid for. >> >> Good idea! >> >> I was also planning on making one for DotCom cabinets, a partial >> width for all those MOTMers using DotCom cabs. >> >> Cheers, >> Scott Deyo >> The Bridechamber >> contact@bridechamber.com >> http://www.bridechamber.com >> Jealous Edison Record Kompany >> http://www.jealousedison.com >> >> >> On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Richard Brewster wrote: >> >>> I've realized that I could use some passive attenuators. Just 100K >>> linear pots wired to jacks for in and out. Three could fit on a 1U >>> MOTM-format panel in the same configuration as an Oakley Multi-Mix. >>> I >>> can easily make a FPE panel design for this, but wouldn't this be a >>> nice >>> addition to Bridechamber? >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Richard Brewster >>> http://www.pugix.com >>> > > >
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] 1U MOTM panel for three passive attenuators
2009-01-28 by Scott Deyo