I like the dot com cabinets a lot. The Stooge flat rails are the key to making the conversion. The only modules that don't fit in the bottom row are those with a Stooge 4-pot LONG bracket, such as the Miniwave. Also, the very middle of the slant cabinet has a wooden brace that limits the depth of the modules right there in the center. Richard Brewster http://www.pugix.com Scott Deyo wrote: > great! thanks. > > and thanks to Richard for figuring out all the kinks : ) > > Scott Deyo > The Bridechamber > contact@... > www.bridechamber.com > > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:30 AM, David Moylan wrote: > > Richard Brewster used them I believe: > > http://www.pugix.com/cabinet_new.htm > > Scott Deyo wrote: > > > > > > So, I had to drop my cabinet sales -- too much work, no space, > prices > > went up, blah blah blah. > > > > Has anyone used DotCom cabs for MOTM modules? Does the double > slant cab > > have enough clearance for jacks on the bottom row? > > > > I was thinking about making a "stubby rail" for the extra 4.75" > and a > > "stubby module" for the extra 1.25" -- 8-way mults or triple > attenuator > > or something. Then you wouldn't need a module to cover blank space. > > > > Any ideas or comments? > > > > Thanks! > > Scott Deyo > > The Bridechamber > > contact@... <mailto:contact%40bridechamber.com> > > www.bridechamber.com > > > > >
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] DotCom Cab Solution
2008-03-08 by Richard Brewster
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.