Modular Synth Panels group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Modular Synth Panels

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:10 UTC

Message

Re: [ModularSynthPanels] DotCom Cab Solution

2008-03-08 by Richard Brewster

I like the dot com cabinets a lot.  The Stooge flat rails are the key to 
making the conversion.  The only modules that don't fit in the bottom 
row are those with a Stooge 4-pot LONG bracket, such as the Miniwave.  
Also, the very middle of the slant cabinet has a wooden brace that 
limits the depth of the modules right there in the center.

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.com

Scott Deyo wrote:
> great! thanks.
>
> and thanks to Richard for figuring out all the kinks : )
>
> Scott Deyo
> The Bridechamber
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:30 AM, David Moylan wrote:
>
>     Richard Brewster used them I believe:
>
>     http://www.pugix.com/cabinet_new.htm
>
>     Scott Deyo wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > So, I had to drop my cabinet sales -- too much work, no space,
>     prices
>     > went up, blah blah blah.
>     >
>     > Has anyone used DotCom cabs for MOTM modules? Does the double
>     slant cab
>     > have enough clearance for jacks on the bottom row?
>     >
>     > I was thinking about making a "stubby rail" for the extra 4.75"
>     and a
>     > "stubby module" for the extra 1.25" -- 8-way mults or triple
>     attenuator
>     > or something. Then you wouldn't need a module to cover blank space.
>     >
>     > Any ideas or comments?
>     >
>     > Thanks!
>     > Scott Deyo
>     > The Bridechamber
>     > contact@... <mailto:contact%40bridechamber.com>
>     > www.bridechamber.com
>     >
>     >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.