Mellotronists group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mellotronists

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:09 UTC

Thread

'Tron hate...

'Tron hate...

2005-04-22 by Jack Younger

Hello again,
     I love to watch the fur fly!  Scathing commentary!  It's funny, one can liken a 
Mellotron to a beloved pet or child.  Stories of abuse bring fierce and bileous 
retribution on the offender.  
    One could argue (although I'm not one to do so, so please don't crack the 
whip) that the 'tron is simply a machine, a thing.  I, for one, could never, after 
all the work, toil and love dumped into the ridiculous box, consider mine 
anything other than a kind of grail of sound.
     I have a friend as well, who swears by the sample.  He also swears by 
protools and I, in turn, swear at him, as a result.  At one point, during a heated 
analog vs digital argument, of which we seem to have an unending supply, I 
mentioned recently aquiring my EMI.  He came over with his infernal laptop 
and we set to comparing the two through my studio's monitors.  To his 
embarassment, the real thing won, of course.  More body and dynamics.  The 
samples were flat and grainy, while the EMI seemed to breathe the notes forth 
like surging ocean waves.  We have not argued about such things since.  
Mellotron - 1, Sampletank - 0.
     I hope to make a few of my more Mellotron-oriented albums available by 
MP3 shortly, so that I may enjoy the spit and daggers of opinion, as well.  The 
reviews from this group are always so refreshingly raw and unabashed.
     That's all for now.  The Bastard EMI (#103) is currently awaiting more parts,   
keys as straight and soft as the best trouser-crease, I'm proud to say.  Much 
thanks to Markus for his brilliant guidance.  I will post a link on my new site 
with before, during and after pics in the summer, upon it's glorious completion.
Cheers!
-Jack Younger

'Tron hate...

2005-04-23 by jonesalley

Thanks, Ken!


----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Ken Leonard" <ken@...>
To: "Mellotronists" <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...


>
> At 08:17 PM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
>
>>Somebody on the list (Ken Leonard?) has a great mp3 file of an A/B test of 
>>a
>>real Mellotron and a sampled Mellotron (eMu Vintage Synth, if I recall)
>>posted on their site - about fifteen minutes of same phrases 
>>back-and-forth,
>
> It's at the bottom of my Tunes page:
>
> http://www.kleonard.com/kltunes/tunes.htm
>
> It's M400 #805 vs. the Roland M-VS1.
>
> Hmmm...Maybe the REAL comparison is comparing #805 to its sampled self
> (which I can also do on my PC)?  Nawww, I have to rearrange my sock 
> drawer.
>
> Hey Jack:  BRAVO!  It sounds like you're really going to town on the 
> EMI!!!
>
> ...kl...
> M400 #805 - immortalized in MP3
> M400 #1037 - was NOT involved in the a/b comparison
>
>
> ** Ken Leonard - Web Table of Contents:  http://www.kleonard.com
> ** Get Outdoors New England:  http://www.GONewEngland.org
> -- Will the US gov't drug your kids?  http://www.DownsizeDC.org
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of 
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, is confidential and 
> proprietary information of AppIQ, Inc., and may contain information that 
> is subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret.  If you have 
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> telephone or email and delete this message from your computer without 
> making a copy.  Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-23 by Andy Thompson

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Jack Younger" <e4103s@...>
To: <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 12:59 AM
Subject: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...


> Hello again,
>      I love to watch the fur fly!  Scathing commentary!

Nah, this isn't fur flying...  :-)

>      I have a friend as well, who swears by the sample.  He also swears by
> protools and I, in turn, swear at him, as a result.  At one point, during
a heated
> analog vs digital argument, of which we seem to have an unending supply, I
> mentioned recently aquiring my EMI.  He came over with his infernal laptop
> and we set to comparing the two through my studio's monitors.  To his
> embarassment, the real thing won, of course.  More body and dynamics.  The
> samples were flat and grainy, while the EMI seemed to breathe the notes
forth
> like surging ocean waves.  We have not argued about such things since.
> Mellotron - 1, Sampletank - 0.

Heh heh heh. Yeah, when neo-prog troupe Galahad (stop laughing at the back)
recorded with mine a few years back, they were of a mind to only replace the
already-recorded 'Tron string samples, leaving the choirs, "'Cos they sound
fine". Until the dreaded A-B comparison. Heh heh heh. Cue replacement of all
samples.

>      I hope to make a few of my more Mellotron-oriented albums available
by
> MP3 shortly, so that I may enjoy the spit and daggers of opinion, as well.
The
> reviews from this group are always so refreshingly raw and unabashed.

I've obviously missed a posting here, Jack - what's available, and where can
I get it?

Andy T.

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-23 by fdoddy@aol.com

Regarding sampling...I'm just amazed at the sheer amount of poor 
craftsmanship when it comes to actually recording a tron into a 
computer. I have sampled my own tron to have a mobile set for work, and 
I'm sorry, but my samples blow away anything coming out of SampleTank, 
Roland, whatever.. Jesus! Read a book!

Fritz
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Younger <e4103s@...>
To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:59:47 -0000
Subject: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...


Hello again,
      I love to watch the fur fly!  Scathing commentary!  It's funny, 
one can
liken a
Mellotron to a beloved pet or child.  Stories of abuse bring fierce and 
bileous
retribution on the offender.
     One could argue (although I'm not one to do so, so please don't 
crack the
whip) that the 'tron is simply a machine, a thing.  I, for one, could 
never,
after
all the work, toil and love dumped into the ridiculous box, consider 
mine
anything other than a kind of grail of sound.
      I have a friend as well, who swears by the sample.  He also swears 
by
protools and I, in turn, swear at him, as a result.  At one point, 
during a
heated
analog vs digital argument, of which we seem to have an unending 
supply, I
mentioned recently aquiring my EMI.  He came over with his infernal 
laptop
and we set to comparing the two through my studio's monitors.  To his
embarassment, the real thing won, of course.  More body and dynamics.  
The
samples were flat and grainy, while the EMI seemed to breathe the notes 
forth
like surging ocean waves.  We have not argued about such things since.
Mellotron - 1, Sampletank - 0.
      I hope to make a few of my more Mellotron-oriented albums 
available by
MP3 shortly, so that I may enjoy the spit and daggers of opinion, as 
well.  The
reviews from this group are always so refreshingly raw and unabashed.
      That's all for now.  The Bastard EMI (#103) is currently awaiting 
more
parts,
keys as straight and soft as the best trouser-crease, I'm proud to say. 
 Much
thanks to Markus for his brilliant guidance.  I will post a link on my 
new site
with before, during and after pics in the summer, upon it's glorious 
completion.
Cheers!
-Jack Younger








Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-23 by jonesalley

That's interesting.  Does giving somebody proper credit for an interesting 
concept connote adhering to their entire philosophy?



----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <fdoddy@...>
To: <jonesalley@...>; <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...


>
> Ayn Rand was a poor misguided soul. Follow the money trail, eat baked
> beans.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jonesalley <jonesalley@...>
> To: Mellotronists <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:17:52 -0500
> Subject: Fw: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...
>
>    Somebody on the list (Ken Leonard?) has a great mp3 file of an A/B
> test of a
> real Mellotron and a sampled Mellotron (eMu Vintage Synth, if I recall)
> posted on their site - about fifteen minutes of same phrases
> back-and-forth,
> and there is NO comparison in this totally unfair competition. It's Ayn
> Rand's "principle of identity" in action.  Real is real.  Anything else
> isn't.  There are people who prefer fake flowers, for some strange
> reason...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-26 by Mattias

" It also sounded only slightly better than an Orchestron. "
Impossible ! Better than a Orchestron ? Tell me more about this magical machine !
// Mattias

[Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-26 by tron@blackcat.demon.co.uk

In the recent message <018401c54a93$41514420$daef42d5@potatis>
you wrote...

> " It also sounded only slightly better than an Orchestron. "
>
> Impossible ! Better than a Orchestron ? Tell me more about this
> magical machine !

How about a turbo vacuum cleaner? That sounds only slightly better than
an Orchestron. A load better than a Birotron, though.

Mike Dickson (tron@...) M400 #996
The Official Cynic of Streetly Electronics
Streetly Sample Library http://www.blackcat.demon.co.uk/tron/

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-28 by Nic Lewis

At 22:52 26/04/05 +0000, tron@... wrote:

>In the recent message <018401c54a93$41514420$daef42d5@potatis>
>you wrote...
>
> > " It also sounded only slightly better than an Orchestron. "
> >
> > Impossible ! Better than a Orchestron ? Tell me more about this
> > magical machine !
>
>How about a turbo vacuum cleaner? That sounds only slightly better than
>an Orchestron. A load better than a Birotron, though.

Hey easy on the poor ole Birotron - tape wander and looping echo gave it a 
much more interesting sound than a turbo-vac. Musically poorer, yeah, but 
more interesting!   And remember, they're as rare as rocking horse s**t 
(and possibly as musical)  ;-)

Occasional post from one who had the (mis)fortune to work on 
Birotrons...........

Nic
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Mike Dickson (tron@...) M400 #996
>The Official Cynic of Streetly Electronics
>Streetly Sample Library http://www.blackcat.demon.co.uk/tron/
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.