Well, said Stefan. All too often people get caught up in the belief there is only one way or one opinion on something and everyone should follow that singular direction. If only one side of ANY topic is allowed for discussion, well, then we might as well call ourselves lemmings and not have any discussions about anything. To blindly follow: a concept, idea, method, technique, or otherwise anything, is selling oneself short. All of these topics we discuss will have two sides of the story. Folks can either take what is written as gospel and follow along, or they can challenge it, try something on their own and perhaps shed some new light on an old subject. Nearly everything written in these forums is based on personal experiences and opinions of those experiences. To squelch them, only serves to stiffle creativity and the exploration of further truths. However, this is just my humble opinion :-) --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100, adicont2 <adicont2@y...> wrote: > > > You are wright, is a holy war, but let's make it creative and realy > > > > useful. > > > > The problem <one method versus another one> is a false problem. "The > > > > best system is the one that works for you" I agree whith you. > > > > We should try to improve both systems or, if we can, inovate a new > > > > one. > > > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > I agree with you. > > However, i will not stand by letting people say things i disagree with > without providing a different point of view. > I do fully accept the photomethod, it is valid, and you get good results, > and i said so before. > But TT _can_ produce results that are by far enough for advanced people > (0.5mm pitch ICs is easily sufficient for most, and it isn't even pushing > the limits). A good TT board is easily as good as a bad photoboard. (and i > made plenty of those ;-).) > I appreciate it if people say their opinion, which is very valid and sure > true from their experience. But when i have a different experience i will > add my point of view. There's no need discussing it to find a agreement, > the reader can easily find what is true for his situation, but it would be > unfair not to offer different opinions if they exist. > > > ST >
Message
Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-16 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.