Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....

2005-11-16 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100, adicont2 <adicont2@...> wrote:

> You are wright, is a holy war, but let's make it creative and realy
>
> useful.
>
> The problem <one method versus another one> is a false problem. "The
>
> best system is the one that works for you" I agree whith you.
>
> We should try to improve both systems or, if we can, inovate a new
>
> one.
>
>
>
>
> Adrian


I agree with you.

However, i will not stand by letting people say things i disagree with  
without providing a different point of view.
I do fully accept the photomethod, it is valid, and you get good results,  
and i said so before.
But TT _can_ produce results that are by far enough for advanced people  
(0.5mm pitch ICs is easily sufficient for most, and it isn't even pushing  
the limits). A good TT board is easily as good as a bad photoboard. (and i  
made plenty of those ;-).)
I appreciate it if people say their opinion, which is very valid and sure  
true from their experience. But when i have a different experience i will  
add my point of view. There's no need discussing it to find a agreement,  
the reader can easily find what is true for his situation, but it would be  
unfair not to offer different opinions if they exist.


ST

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.