On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100, adicont2 <adicont2@...> wrote: > You are wright, is a holy war, but let's make it creative and realy > > useful. > > The problem <one method versus another one> is a false problem. "The > > best system is the one that works for you" I agree whith you. > > We should try to improve both systems or, if we can, inovate a new > > one. > > > > > Adrian I agree with you. However, i will not stand by letting people say things i disagree with without providing a different point of view. I do fully accept the photomethod, it is valid, and you get good results, and i said so before. But TT _can_ produce results that are by far enough for advanced people (0.5mm pitch ICs is easily sufficient for most, and it isn't even pushing the limits). A good TT board is easily as good as a bad photoboard. (and i made plenty of those ;-).) I appreciate it if people say their opinion, which is very valid and sure true from their experience. But when i have a different experience i will add my point of view. There's no need discussing it to find a agreement, the reader can easily find what is true for his situation, but it would be unfair not to offer different opinions if they exist. ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-16 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.