As long as it's a VC clock with versatile range. Otherwise, you're really better off with a VCO or VCLFO. > -----Original Message----- > From: bakis Sirros [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:58 PM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A154 clock function > > > i agree. > bakis. > > > --- ethanzer0 <ethanzer0@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Given that philosophy, I think the > > > clock generator function should be > > > removed from the A154. I don't quite > > > see how its different than adding > > > an envelope function to this module. > > > > At the risk of being drawn into a > > lengthy argument, I would like > > to my point of view on this. > > > > A sequence by definition is > > chronological events. A chronometer > > is another name for a clock. > > Without a clock, you cannot have > > a sequence. > > > > $.02 > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > ===== > synthfreak(parallel worlds) > athens-greece > [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 > > To unsubscribe from this group, > send an email to: doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A154 clock function
2002-11-13 by unknown freak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.