Same here.. On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote: > > > i also put my A108 audio input (of all 3 A108's of mine) to around 9 > o'clock for non-distorted input. > so, i think this behavior of the A108 is normal and not defective. > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > www. DiN. org. uk > > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > www. vu-us. com > > --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de<fanwander%40mnet-online.de>> > wrote: > > From: Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de<fanwander%40mnet-online.de> > > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-108 opinions? > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 10:48 AM > > > > > Hi Jari > > replacing the potentiometer doesn't change anything. I don't have the > > schematics of the A108 here, but there is usually an input opamp, which > > has assumingly a too high amplification due to a defective or wrong > > feedback resistor. For dedicated error tracing some measuring equipment > > (oscilloscope, ohmmeter) and mesauring know how is needed. > > I am sure Dieter will jump in soon. > > Florian > > jalmari3 schrieb: > > > The other pots are B50K (linear?). If I swap all except Frequency pot to > A50K, do I get less sensitivity at near counter clockwise position wihtout > loss of range here too? Attenuating would then work like with Cwejman > modules, which I prefer? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-108 opinions?
2010-03-26 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.