Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-21 by Brian Ellis

"I sure hope it isn't a
function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink."

I don't know about "better" but as I recall several people here have posted 
dMax measurements of Eboni compared to Epson MK and Eboni did in fact have a 
greater dMax though I don't remember the difference being dramatic.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "how786" <how786@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:09 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession


OK.  I need some help here. I'm still fiddling around with my 2400
trying to make a print that matches the 220 BO output. (How
bizarre)Right now, I'm getting closer. The main difference is that the
220 BO prints have deeper blacks.
 I'm not sure what to adjust in the 2400 ADV. B&W driver to deepen the
blacks. I'd appreciate some help with this.....I sure hope it isn't a
function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink!
 Thanks
 Howard



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
<how786@...> wrote:
>
>  Today, I finally got down to seriously testing and looking at 8X10
> prints made by my 2400 and comparing them to BO (Eboni Black) prints
> made on my 220. I did my prints on Merlin Natural.
>  My surprising confession/conclusion is that no matter how hard I try
> to tweak the 2400 prints in the Advanced B&W mode, I find the 220 BO
> prints more pleasing to my eye. I am in somewhat of a stunned state
> regarding this. That a printer I paid $69 for can make a print that I
> prefer over those made in my $700 printer shocks my sensibility.
>  I am going to try some more to see if I can just get the 2400 to
> match what the 220 is outputing.
>  Best to all
>  Howard
>







Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as 
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same 
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep 
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from 
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and 
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU 
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY 
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, 
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE 
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY 
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY 
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-21 by how786

Thanks Brian.
  Perhaps Clayton can help me out here since he has done so much work
on the 200 with BO and I think also prints on a 2400. 
  I wonder if anyone ever tried Eboni Black in the 2400......
  I am still in a bit of shock regarding how darn good the prints look
from the 220 BO. It's pretty astounding. I sure hope it doesn't come
to me buying a 2200 for large BO prints (!) I'm hoping Clayton will
know what I can tweak in my 2400 drivers to at least approximate the
lovely look of BO/220.
 Thanks
  Howard
   
  
 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Ellis"
<bellis60@...> wrote:
>
> "I sure hope it isn't a
> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink."
> 
> I don't know about "better" but as I recall several people here have
posted 
> dMax measurements of Eboni compared to Epson MK and Eboni did in
fact have a 
> greater dMax though I don't remember the difference being dramatic.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "how786" <how786@...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:09 PM
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession
> 
> 
> OK.  I need some help here. I'm still fiddling around with my 2400
> trying to make a print that matches the 220 BO output. (How
> bizarre)Right now, I'm getting closer. The main difference is that the
> 220 BO prints have deeper blacks.
>  I'm not sure what to adjust in the 2400 ADV. B&W driver to deepen the
> blacks. I'd appreciate some help with this.....I sure hope it isn't a
> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink!
>  Thanks
>  Howard
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
> <how786@> wrote:
> >
> >  Today, I finally got down to seriously testing and looking at 8X10
> > prints made by my 2400 and comparing them to BO (Eboni Black) prints
> > made on my 220. I did my prints on Merlin Natural.
> >  My surprising confession/conclusion is that no matter how hard I try
> > to tweak the 2400 prints in the Advanced B&W mode, I find the 220 BO
> > prints more pleasing to my eye. I am in somewhat of a stunned state
> > regarding this. That a printer I paid $69 for can make a print that I
> > prefer over those made in my $700 printer shocks my sensibility.
> >  I am going to try some more to see if I can just get the 2400 to
> > match what the 220 is outputing.
> >  Best to all
> >  Howard
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as 
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same 
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep 
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed
from 
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner and 
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT 
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND 
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU 
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
EXEMPLARY 
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, 
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER"
AND 
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED
OF THE 
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE
INABILITY 
> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED
ACCESS TO OR 
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
CONDUCT OF ANY 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-21 by Carl Schofield

The MIS K4 inkset for the 2400 includes Ebony for the matte black  
option.  Ebony in the 2400 does produce a higher dmax on some 3rd  
party papers (notably Hahnemuhle Photo Rag) compared to the Epson  
matte black, but just the opposite is true for epson papers (eg.  
epson MK give higher dmax on Velvet FIne Art compared to Ebony).  All  
of these comparisons are with reference to using ABW mode on the 2400  
- not BO, which is not available on the 2400 (You can specify "BLACK"  
in the Mac 2400 driver but it will still use all of the color inks).

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mar 21, 2006, at 2:48 PM, how786 wrote:

>   Thanks Brian.
>   Perhaps Clayton can help me out here since he has done so much work
> on the 200 with BO and I think also prints on a 2400.
>   I wonder if anyone ever tried Eboni Black in the 2400......
>   I am still in a bit of shock regarding how darn good the prints look
> from the 220 BO. It's pretty astounding. I sure hope it doesn't come
> to me buying a 2200 for large BO prints (!) I'm hoping Clayton will
> know what I can tweak in my 2400 drivers to at least approximate the
> lovely look of BO/220.
>  Thanks
>   Howard
>
>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Ellis"
> <bellis60@...> wrote:
>>
>> "I sure hope it isn't a
>> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink."
>>
>> I don't know about "better" but as I recall several people here have
> posted
>> dMax measurements of Eboni compared to Epson MK and Eboni did in
> fact have a
>> greater dMax though I don't remember the difference being dramatic.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "how786" <how786@...>
>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:09 PM
>> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO  
>> confession
>>
>>
>> OK.  I need some help here. I'm still fiddling around with my 2400
>> trying to make a print that matches the 220 BO output. (How
>> bizarre)Right now, I'm getting closer. The main difference is that  
>> the
>> 220 BO prints have deeper blacks.
>>  I'm not sure what to adjust in the 2400 ADV. B&W driver to deepen  
>> the
>> blacks. I'd appreciate some help with this.....I sure hope it isn't a
>> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink!
>>  Thanks
>>  Howard
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
>> <how786@> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Today, I finally got down to seriously testing and looking at 8X10
>>> prints made by my 2400 and comparing them to BO (Eboni Black) prints
>>> made on my 220. I did my prints on Merlin Natural.
>>>  My surprising confession/conclusion is that no matter how hard I  
>>> try
>>> to tweak the 2400 prints in the Advanced B&W mode, I find the 220 BO
>>> prints more pleasing to my eye. I am in somewhat of a stunned state
>>> regarding this. That a printer I paid $69 for can make a print  
>>> that I
>>> prefer over those made in my $700 printer shocks my sensibility.
>>>  I am going to try some more to see if I can just get the 2400 to
>>> match what the 220 is outputing.
>>>  Best to all
>>>  Howard
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-21 by how786

Thanks for this information Carl.
Best
Howard

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
<scho@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> The MIS K4 inkset for the 2400 includes Ebony for the matte black  
> option.  Ebony in the 2400 does produce a higher dmax on some 3rd  
> party papers (notably Hahnemuhle Photo Rag) compared to the Epson  
> matte black, but just the opposite is true for epson papers (eg.  
> epson MK give higher dmax on Velvet FIne Art compared to Ebony).  All  
> of these comparisons are with reference to using ABW mode on the 2400  
> - not BO, which is not available on the 2400 (You can specify "BLACK"  
> in the Mac 2400 driver but it will still use all of the color inks).
> 
> Carl
> 
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 2:48 PM, how786 wrote:
> 
> >   Thanks Brian.
> >   Perhaps Clayton can help me out here since he has done so much work
> > on the 200 with BO and I think also prints on a 2400.
> >   I wonder if anyone ever tried Eboni Black in the 2400......
> >   I am still in a bit of shock regarding how darn good the prints look
> > from the 220 BO. It's pretty astounding. I sure hope it doesn't come
> > to me buying a 2200 for large BO prints (!) I'm hoping Clayton will
> > know what I can tweak in my 2400 drivers to at least approximate the
> > lovely look of BO/220.
> >  Thanks
> >   Howard
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Ellis"
> > <bellis60@> wrote:
> >>
> >> "I sure hope it isn't a
> >> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink."
> >>
> >> I don't know about "better" but as I recall several people here have
> > posted
> >> dMax measurements of Eboni compared to Epson MK and Eboni did in
> > fact have a
> >> greater dMax though I don't remember the difference being dramatic.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "how786" <how786@>
> >> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:09 PM
> >> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO  
> >> confession
> >>
> >>
> >> OK.  I need some help here. I'm still fiddling around with my 2400
> >> trying to make a print that matches the 220 BO output. (How
> >> bizarre)Right now, I'm getting closer. The main difference is that  
> >> the
> >> 220 BO prints have deeper blacks.
> >>  I'm not sure what to adjust in the 2400 ADV. B&W driver to deepen  
> >> the
> >> blacks. I'd appreciate some help with this.....I sure hope it isn't a
> >> function of the Eboni Black simply being better ink!
> >>  Thanks
> >>  Howard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
> >> <how786@> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Today, I finally got down to seriously testing and looking at 8X10
> >>> prints made by my 2400 and comparing them to BO (Eboni Black) prints
> >>> made on my 220. I did my prints on Merlin Natural.
> >>>  My surprising confession/conclusion is that no matter how hard I  
> >>> try
> >>> to tweak the 2400 prints in the Advanced B&W mode, I find the 220 BO
> >>> prints more pleasing to my eye. I am in somewhat of a stunned state
> >>> regarding this. That a printer I paid $69 for can make a print  
> >>> that I
> >>> prefer over those made in my $700 printer shocks my sensibility.
> >>>  I am going to try some more to see if I can just get the 2400 to
> >>> match what the 220 is outputing.
> >>>  Best to all
> >>>  Howard
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
>

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by Clayton Jones

Hello Howard,

Sorry to come into this so late.  Have been busy all day & evening.

There are several things going on here.  First the dmax.  As Carl
said, Eboni has slightly better dmax than MK on most matte papers
except Epson ones.  So if you tried it on VFA the result might be
different.  Also, Eboni is a bit cooler than MK, which can make the
blacks appear darker to the eye.  Another thing is that in BO prints
the blacks are made from pure black ink.  With full ink systems there
is usually a mixture of MK and LK way down into the darkest zones,
only getting to pure black ink at RGB 0 and 1, maybe 2 (above 99%).  

Dmax tests that print patches of pure black usually show just as good
a dmax with full ink systems.  But in most real world prints even the
darkest areas only get all the way to RGB 0 in small areas, so there's
often very few places that contain pure black ink.  The end result of
this varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer and
driver, but in general, most of the systems I've tried or viewed
produce slightly less dmax than BO, with normal images.  This is why I
use Eboni BO for all my tests in the Paper Chase article.

Next, the general look and feel.  BO prints are famous for their
intensity, or "pop", or whatever you want to call it.  Besides the
excellent dmax, there a clarity to the ink tones that comes from the
pure K ink without anything else blended in.  There is also the
incredible luminance or "glow", which is caused by the bare paper that
shows between the dots.  Because BO prints don't get to full paper
coverage (no more white specs showing) until around 85% or so (it
varies with the paper), this luminance extends way down into the lower
mid-tones.  The paper is reflective, so the resulting prints have this
wonderful clear, open and radiant look to them.  

Full ink systems don't allow this bare paper to show and as a result
have a slightly veiled or opaque look.  The degree of this effect, as
with dmax, varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer
and driver.  The result is that a full ink print can look great until
you put a BO print next to it, and suddenly it looks weak in comparison.

What I like about the 2400 is that its prints have better luminance
than many full ink systems I've seen.  It allows more bare paper to
show between the ink dots in the highlights than many other systems. 
For example, I'm using the R2 ink sets in my R200, so I can do Eboni
BO and smooth full ink prints with it.  It's really quite good, but
the R2 prints are more veiled and opaque looking than ABW/K3 prints
because there is no bare paper showing anywhere except at RGB 254 and
255 (0%).   The ABW prints show bare paper down to around RGB 190 (25%).  

The resulting K3 prints are not as clear and glowing as BO prints, but
they are much better than many other full ink systems.  BO's great
weakness of course is the graininess, which can be a curse or a
blessing, depending on the image.

I'm very pleased with the R200/2400 combination.  I still use BO for
prints that look good with it, and the 2400 is producing really
beautiful prints that are wonderfully smooth with the three blacks. 
I'm finding it a good combination, but I do miss my trusty old 2200
because now I'm limited to letter size BO prints.

So you might as well give up trying to make a K3 print look like a BO
one.  It's just an excercise in frustration.  Just learn to wring the
most you can out of the 2400 and be thankful.

ps - there is still the possibility of getting good BO from a 2400
using a RIP.  I tried it with QTR last fall but the results were poor
due to a very coarse dot pattern.  Roy says the later versions have
better 2400 handling and maybe it's improved.  I've been too busy to
try it, but hope to get to it after the end of May when I'll have more
time.  I haven't given up on it yet.

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by how786

Dear Clayton,

  Thanks for the marvellous details in your reply. Your explanation
helps me to understand just what is going on and why my eye sees what
it does.
 Yes, the BO prints DO have a luminosity, a glow that is quite
amazing. And, yes, the 2400 prints look just fine until you place them
next to a BO print. Then they look a tad 'blocked'. 
 With all my fiddling around I finally did manage to get the output of
the 2400 to look very close to the BO prints. VERY close, so I am
pleased and relieved.
 You know, the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
sells them for $69. It's a steal.

 :)

 Thanks again for your ever-present willing help
 I deeply appreciate it.

  Howard

 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
<cj@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Howard,
> 
> Sorry to come into this so late.  Have been busy all day & evening.
> 
> There are several things going on here.  First the dmax.  As Carl
> said, Eboni has slightly better dmax than MK on most matte papers
> except Epson ones.  So if you tried it on VFA the result might be
> different.  Also, Eboni is a bit cooler than MK, which can make the
> blacks appear darker to the eye.  Another thing is that in BO prints
> the blacks are made from pure black ink.  With full ink systems there
> is usually a mixture of MK and LK way down into the darkest zones,
> only getting to pure black ink at RGB 0 and 1, maybe 2 (above 99%).  
> 
> Dmax tests that print patches of pure black usually show just as good
> a dmax with full ink systems.  But in most real world prints even the
> darkest areas only get all the way to RGB 0 in small areas, so there's
> often very few places that contain pure black ink.  The end result of
> this varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer and
> driver, but in general, most of the systems I've tried or viewed
> produce slightly less dmax than BO, with normal images.  This is why I
> use Eboni BO for all my tests in the Paper Chase article.
> 
> Next, the general look and feel.  BO prints are famous for their
> intensity, or "pop", or whatever you want to call it.  Besides the
> excellent dmax, there a clarity to the ink tones that comes from the
> pure K ink without anything else blended in.  There is also the
> incredible luminance or "glow", which is caused by the bare paper that
> shows between the dots.  Because BO prints don't get to full paper
> coverage (no more white specs showing) until around 85% or so (it
> varies with the paper), this luminance extends way down into the lower
> mid-tones.  The paper is reflective, so the resulting prints have this
> wonderful clear, open and radiant look to them.  
> 
> Full ink systems don't allow this bare paper to show and as a result
> have a slightly veiled or opaque look.  The degree of this effect, as
> with dmax, varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer
> and driver.  The result is that a full ink print can look great until
> you put a BO print next to it, and suddenly it looks weak in comparison.
> 
> What I like about the 2400 is that its prints have better luminance
> than many full ink systems I've seen.  It allows more bare paper to
> show between the ink dots in the highlights than many other systems. 
> For example, I'm using the R2 ink sets in my R200, so I can do Eboni
> BO and smooth full ink prints with it.  It's really quite good, but
> the R2 prints are more veiled and opaque looking than ABW/K3 prints
> because there is no bare paper showing anywhere except at RGB 254 and
> 255 (0%).   The ABW prints show bare paper down to around RGB 190
(25%).  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> The resulting K3 prints are not as clear and glowing as BO prints, but
> they are much better than many other full ink systems.  BO's great
> weakness of course is the graininess, which can be a curse or a
> blessing, depending on the image.
> 
> I'm very pleased with the R200/2400 combination.  I still use BO for
> prints that look good with it, and the 2400 is producing really
> beautiful prints that are wonderfully smooth with the three blacks. 
> I'm finding it a good combination, but I do miss my trusty old 2200
> because now I'm limited to letter size BO prints.
> 
> So you might as well give up trying to make a K3 print look like a BO
> one.  It's just an excercise in frustration.  Just learn to wring the
> most you can out of the 2400 and be thankful.
> 
> ps - there is still the possibility of getting good BO from a 2400
> using a RIP.  I tried it with QTR last fall but the results were poor
> due to a very coarse dot pattern.  Roy says the later versions have
> better 2400 handling and maybe it's improved.  I've been too busy to
> try it, but hope to get to it after the end of May when I'll have more
> time.  I haven't given up on it yet.
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by Daniela Gattarino

Dear Howard,
would you, please, share with us your findings and tell how you managed
to got BO-like prints with the R2400.?
Thanks
 Daniela

how786 <how786@...> wrote:     Dear Clayton,
 
   Thanks for the marvellous details in your reply. Your explanation
 helps me to understand just what is going on and why my eye sees what
 it does.
  Yes, the BO prints DO have a luminosity, a glow that is quite
 amazing. And, yes, the 2400 prints look just fine until you place them
 next to a BO print. Then they look a tad 'blocked'. 
  With all my fiddling around I finally did manage to get the output of
 the 2400 to look very close to the BO prints. VERY close, so I am
 pleased and relieved.
  You know, the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
 one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
 sells them for $69. It's a steal.
 
  :)
 
  Thanks again for your ever-present willing help
  I deeply appreciate it.
 
   Howard
 
  
 
 
 --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
 <cj@...> wrote:
 >
 > Hello Howard,
 > 
 > Sorry to come into this so late.  Have been busy all day & evening.
 > 
 > There are several things going on here.  First the dmax.  As Carl
 > said, Eboni has slightly better dmax than MK on most matte papers
 > except Epson ones.  So if you tried it on VFA the result might be
 > different.  Also, Eboni is a bit cooler than MK, which can make the
 > blacks appear darker to the eye.  Another thing is that in BO prints
 > the blacks are made from pure black ink.  With full ink systems there
 > is usually a mixture of MK and LK way down into the darkest zones,
 > only getting to pure black ink at RGB 0 and 1, maybe 2 (above 99%).  
 > 
 > Dmax tests that print patches of pure black usually show just as good
 > a dmax with full ink systems.  But in most real world prints even the
 > darkest areas only get all the way to RGB 0 in small areas, so there's
 > often very few places that contain pure black ink.  The end result of
 > this varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer and
 > driver, but in general, most of the systems I've tried or viewed
 > produce slightly less dmax than BO, with normal images.  This is why I
 > use Eboni BO for all my tests in the Paper Chase article.
 > 
 > Next, the general look and feel.  BO prints are famous for their
 > intensity, or "pop", or whatever you want to call it.  Besides the
 > excellent dmax, there a clarity to the ink tones that comes from the
 > pure K ink without anything else blended in.  There is also the
 > incredible luminance or "glow", which is caused by the bare paper that
 > shows between the dots.  Because BO prints don't get to full paper
 > coverage (no more white specs showing) until around 85% or so (it
 > varies with the paper), this luminance extends way down into the lower
 > mid-tones.  The paper is reflective, so the resulting prints have this
 > wonderful clear, open and radiant look to them.  
 > 
 > Full ink systems don't allow this bare paper to show and as a result
 > have a slightly veiled or opaque look.  The degree of this effect, as
 > with dmax, varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer
 > and driver.  The result is that a full ink print can look great until
 > you put a BO print next to it, and suddenly it looks weak in comparison.
 > 
 > What I like about the 2400 is that its prints have better luminance
 > than many full ink systems I've seen.  It allows more bare paper to
 > show between the ink dots in the highlights than many other systems. 
 > For example, I'm using the R2 ink sets in my R200, so I can do Eboni
 > BO and smooth full ink prints with it.  It's really quite good, but
 > the R2 prints are more veiled and opaque looking than ABW/K3 prints
 > because there is no bare paper showing anywhere except at RGB 254 and
 > 255 (0%).   The ABW prints show bare paper down to around RGB 190
 (25%).  
 > 
 > The resulting K3 prints are not as clear and glowing as BO prints, but
 > they are much better than many other full ink systems.  BO's great
 > weakness of course is the graininess, which can be a curse or a
 > blessing, depending on the image.
 > 
 > I'm very pleased with the R200/2400 combination.  I still use BO for
 > prints that look good with it, and the 2400 is producing really
 > beautiful prints that are wonderfully smooth with the three blacks. 
 > I'm finding it a good combination, but I do miss my trusty old 2200
 > because now I'm limited to letter size BO prints.
 > 
 > So you might as well give up trying to make a K3 print look like a BO
 > one.  It's just an excercise in frustration.  Just learn to wring the
 > most you can out of the 2400 and be thankful.
 > 
 > ps - there is still the possibility of getting good BO from a 2400
 > using a RIP.  I tried it with QTR last fall but the results were poor
 > due to a very coarse dot pattern.  Roy says the later versions have
 > better 2400 handling and maybe it's improved.  I've been too busy to
 > try it, but hope to get to it after the end of May when I'll have more
 > time.  I haven't given up on it yet.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > Clayton
 > 
 > 
 > Info on black and white digital printing at    
 > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
 >
 
 
 
 
      

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
 
 If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
 
 Please follow these basic guidelines:
 - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
 - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
 - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
 - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
 
 BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
  

              

        SPONSORED LINKS   
                                                    Digital wedding photography                                       Learn digital photography                                       Digital photography college                                                                     Digital photography                                       Digital photography web site                                       Digital photography course                                                                 
      
---------------------------------
   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
 
    
    Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
 
    
---------------------------------
 
 
     

		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail
 Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by how786

Dear Daniela,
 **DISCLAIMER**
 Bear in mind what I've done only applies to my monitor (Hitachi CM815
plus), Merlin Natural and the particular set of negatives I am working
with right now. The settings that worked best at getting close to
reproducing the BO output of my 220 are somewhat strange, imo.
 But, here is what worked best with this particular batch of negatives
at approximating the 220 BO output on Merlin Natural:

  Media type=VFA
  Best Photo
  Uncheck high speed
  ABW-fine adjustment
  Tone=Light
  Brightness= -5
  Contrast= +11
  Shadow Tonality= +7
  Highlight Tonality= -25 (!)
  Horiz= +3
  Vert= +8

  Best Regards
  Howard

  

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Daniela Gattarino
<dgattarino@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Howard,
> would you, please, share with us your findings and tell how you managed
> to got BO-like prints with the R2400.?
> Thanks
>  Daniela
> 
> how786 <how786@...> wrote:     Dear Clayton,
>  
>    Thanks for the marvellous details in your reply. Your explanation
>  helps me to understand just what is going on and why my eye sees what
>  it does.
>   Yes, the BO prints DO have a luminosity, a glow that is quite
>  amazing. And, yes, the 2400 prints look just fine until you place them
>  next to a BO print. Then they look a tad 'blocked'. 
>   With all my fiddling around I finally did manage to get the output of
>  the 2400 to look very close to the BO prints. VERY close, so I am
>  pleased and relieved.
>   You know, the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
>  one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
>  sells them for $69. It's a steal.
>  
>   :)
>  
>   Thanks again for your ever-present willing help
>   I deeply appreciate it.
>  
>    Howard
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
>  <cj@> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hello Howard,
>  > 
>  > Sorry to come into this so late.  Have been busy all day & evening.
>  > 
>  > There are several things going on here.  First the dmax.  As Carl
>  > said, Eboni has slightly better dmax than MK on most matte papers
>  > except Epson ones.  So if you tried it on VFA the result might be
>  > different.  Also, Eboni is a bit cooler than MK, which can make the
>  > blacks appear darker to the eye.  Another thing is that in BO prints
>  > the blacks are made from pure black ink.  With full ink systems there
>  > is usually a mixture of MK and LK way down into the darkest zones,
>  > only getting to pure black ink at RGB 0 and 1, maybe 2 (above 99%).  
>  > 
>  > Dmax tests that print patches of pure black usually show just as good
>  > a dmax with full ink systems.  But in most real world prints even the
>  > darkest areas only get all the way to RGB 0 in small areas, so
there's
>  > often very few places that contain pure black ink.  The end result of
>  > this varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer and
>  > driver, but in general, most of the systems I've tried or viewed
>  > produce slightly less dmax than BO, with normal images.  This is
why I
>  > use Eboni BO for all my tests in the Paper Chase article.
>  > 
>  > Next, the general look and feel.  BO prints are famous for their
>  > intensity, or "pop", or whatever you want to call it.  Besides the
>  > excellent dmax, there a clarity to the ink tones that comes from the
>  > pure K ink without anything else blended in.  There is also the
>  > incredible luminance or "glow", which is caused by the bare paper
that
>  > shows between the dots.  Because BO prints don't get to full paper
>  > coverage (no more white specs showing) until around 85% or so (it
>  > varies with the paper), this luminance extends way down into the
lower
>  > mid-tones.  The paper is reflective, so the resulting prints have
this
>  > wonderful clear, open and radiant look to them.  
>  > 
>  > Full ink systems don't allow this bare paper to show and as a result
>  > have a slightly veiled or opaque look.  The degree of this effect, as
>  > with dmax, varies with different combinations of ink, paper, printer
>  > and driver.  The result is that a full ink print can look great until
>  > you put a BO print next to it, and suddenly it looks weak in
comparison.
>  > 
>  > What I like about the 2400 is that its prints have better luminance
>  > than many full ink systems I've seen.  It allows more bare paper to
>  > show between the ink dots in the highlights than many other systems. 
>  > For example, I'm using the R2 ink sets in my R200, so I can do Eboni
>  > BO and smooth full ink prints with it.  It's really quite good, but
>  > the R2 prints are more veiled and opaque looking than ABW/K3 prints
>  > because there is no bare paper showing anywhere except at RGB 254 and
>  > 255 (0%).   The ABW prints show bare paper down to around RGB 190
>  (25%).  
>  > 
>  > The resulting K3 prints are not as clear and glowing as BO
prints, but
>  > they are much better than many other full ink systems.  BO's great
>  > weakness of course is the graininess, which can be a curse or a
>  > blessing, depending on the image.
>  > 
>  > I'm very pleased with the R200/2400 combination.  I still use BO for
>  > prints that look good with it, and the 2400 is producing really
>  > beautiful prints that are wonderfully smooth with the three blacks. 
>  > I'm finding it a good combination, but I do miss my trusty old 2200
>  > because now I'm limited to letter size BO prints.
>  > 
>  > So you might as well give up trying to make a K3 print look like a BO
>  > one.  It's just an excercise in frustration.  Just learn to wring the
>  > most you can out of the 2400 and be thankful.
>  > 
>  > ps - there is still the possibility of getting good BO from a 2400
>  > using a RIP.  I tried it with QTR last fall but the results were poor
>  > due to a very coarse dot pattern.  Roy says the later versions have
>  > better 2400 handling and maybe it's improved.  I've been too busy to
>  > try it, but hope to get to it after the end of May when I'll have
more
>  > time.  I haven't given up on it yet.
>  > 
>  > Regards,
>  > Clayton
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Info on black and white digital printing at    
>  > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>  >
>  
>  
>  
>  
>       
> 
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as they are often being updated.
>  
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>  
>  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by
visiting this same page.
>  
>  Please follow these basic guidelines:
>  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep them short.
>  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from
the membership without notice.
>  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital
B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
removed from the membership.
>  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules
and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the
Files section:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>  
>  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER"
AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE
LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES),
RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,
THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF
YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD
PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>   
> 
>               
> 
>         SPONSORED LINKS   
>                                                     Digital wedding
photography                                       Learn digital
photography                                       Digital photography
college                                                              
      Digital photography                                      
Digital photography web site                                      
Digital photography course                                           
                     
>       
> ---------------------------------
>    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>  
>     
>     Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
>     
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>     
>     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>  
>     
> ---------------------------------
>  
>  
>      
> 
> 		
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! Mail
>  Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by Paul Roark

> ... the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
> one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
> sells them for $69. It's a steal.
> 

For what it's worth, dedicated B7W inks and BO also appear to be more
lightfast than the 10 times more expensive 2400 printer's "Advanced B&W"
output.  Carbon is the most lightfast of the pigments, and the 2400, 4800,
and other K3 printers use more color inks than are needed just to neutralize
the carbon.  See a close-up scan of a 4800 "Advanced B&W" mode print here:
http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4800_ABW_5-10_1600scan.jpg

Due to the use of more than the minimum amount of color and due to the
dedicated B&W inksets blending the color they do use with carbon so that
carbon as opposed to just paper backs up the color pigments, my fade tests
show a substantial advantage to the dedicated B&W inksets.  See
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/71745 

So, while the 2400, k3 approach is very convenient for those who do both
color and B&W printing, for the B&W purist the dedicated B&W inksets would
appear to still have a significant edge.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by how786

Thanks for your always astute/informative comments Paul.
What are the chances of us getting a dedicated B&W inkset for the 2400?
Regards
Howard


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> > ... the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
> > one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
> > sells them for $69. It's a steal.
> > 
> 
> For what it's worth, dedicated B7W inks and BO also appear to be more
> lightfast than the 10 times more expensive 2400 printer's "Advanced B&W"
> output.  Carbon is the most lightfast of the pigments, and the 2400,
4800,
> and other K3 printers use more color inks than are needed just to
neutralize
> the carbon.  See a close-up scan of a 4800 "Advanced B&W" mode print
here:
> http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4800_ABW_5-10_1600scan.jpg
> 
> Due to the use of more than the minimum amount of color and due to the
> dedicated B&W inksets blending the color they do use with carbon so that
> carbon as opposed to just paper backs up the color pigments, my fade
tests
> show a substantial advantage to the dedicated B&W inksets.  See
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/71745 
> 
> So, while the 2400, k3 approach is very convenient for those who do both
> color and B&W printing, for the B&W purist the dedicated B&W inksets
would
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> appear to still have a significant edge.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-22 by Paul Roark

> What are the chances of us getting a dedicated B&W inkset for the 2400?

I'll probably get to that platform later, but not in the immediate future.
I'm more interested in facilitating cheaper approaches at the moment.
Specifically, I want to get the UT-3D running on a wide range of printers
first.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-23 by Andre

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> > What are the chances of us getting a dedicated B&W inkset for the
2400?
> 
> I'll probably get to that platform later, but not in the immediate
future.
> I'm more interested in facilitating cheaper approaches at the moment.
> Specifically, I want to get the UT-3D running on a wide range of
printers
> first.
> 
Paul,

Would the Epson 1160 be included in that wide range of printers ?

TIA,
André

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-23 by Paul Roark

No, the UT-3D is going to take a hextone or UD k2 printer.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:05 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@...> wrote:
> >
> > > What are the chances of us getting a dedicated B&W inkset for the
> 2400?
> >
> > I'll probably get to that platform later, but not in the immediate
> future.
> > I'm more interested in facilitating cheaper approaches at the moment.
> > Specifically, I want to get the UT-3D running on a wide range of
> printers
> > first.
> >
> Paul,
> 
> Would the Epson 1160 be included in that wide range of printers ?
> 
> TIA,
> André
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-25 by how786

Another interesting observation is that I seem to be able to make a
heck of a lot of 8.5X11 prints with the 220 and BO. I believe I've
made 30 or 40 today at the Best Photo setting and still have 1/3
inkcart left.
 Regards
 Howard


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
<how786@...> wrote:
>
>   Thanks for your always astute/informative comments Paul.
> What are the chances of us getting a dedicated B&W inkset for the 2400?
> Regards
> Howard
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > > ... the 220 prints SO well that I am tempted to buy a second
> > > one and put it away as a backup. The place I bought mine from still
> > > sells them for $69. It's a steal.
> > > 
> > 
> > For what it's worth, dedicated B7W inks and BO also appear to be more
> > lightfast than the 10 times more expensive 2400 printer's
"Advanced B&W"
> > output.  Carbon is the most lightfast of the pigments, and the 2400,
> 4800,
> > and other K3 printers use more color inks than are needed just to
> neutralize
> > the carbon.  See a close-up scan of a 4800 "Advanced B&W" mode print
> here:
> > http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4800_ABW_5-10_1600scan.jpg
> > 
> > Due to the use of more than the minimum amount of color and due to the
> > dedicated B&W inksets blending the color they do use with carbon
so that
> > carbon as opposed to just paper backs up the color pigments, my fade
> tests
> > show a substantial advantage to the dedicated B&W inksets.  See
> >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/71745 
> > 
> > So, while the 2400, k3 approach is very convenient for those who
do both
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > color and B&W printing, for the B&W purist the dedicated B&W inksets
> would
> > appear to still have a significant edge.
> > 
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
>

[Digital BW] Re: Somewhat embarrassing 220/2400 BO confession

2006-03-25 by Clayton Jones

Hello Howard,

>Another interesting observation is that I seem to be able to make a
>heck of a lot of 8.5X11 prints with the 220 and BO. I believe I've
>made 30 or 40 today at the Best Photo setting and still have 1/3
>inkcart left.

Absolutely.  It's one of the advantages of BO.  Because of the bare
paper showing between the dots there is a lot less ink used, the
amount depending of course on how dark the image is.  A high key image
will use even less.  A full ink system always covers the entire area
with ink.  This is one of the reasons my proofing is done with BO, it
saves a significant amount of money.


Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.