Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Image management software

Image management software

2002-06-03 by stevekphoto

Hello all;

Last week I hung a show in Miami-silver prints on the wall, but 
around 30 inkjet prints in portfolio boxes on the side. I had them 
labeled as 'Archival Quality Carbon Pigment Giclee Prints' on the 
back along with 'care and feeding 'instructions. They were priced at 
$150.00 each, for 9x12 prints on 13x17 paper. At the opening last 
Friday, lot of poeple looked at them very carefully, asked a few 
questions, and some seemed interested in owning one or two. I didn't 
get any really direct feedback at that time, but over the next week 
or two I hope to get a better idea through the gallery manager as to 
what kind of impression they made. I hope that seeing them in the 
environment of a gallery will overcome some of the resistance others 
have reported, though I suspect it'll be a long slow process. I'll 
post an udpate if anything comes of it...

Also: a couple weeks ago I mentioned an image management program in 
development called ITRAK; It is now available as a functional demo 
if any one is interested: http://www.cjcom.net/itrakcore.htm  This 
was written to do a few things well: keep track of your images and 
prints, and provide you with a consignment record/inventory when you 
send work out. A very usefull tool for exhibiting photographers.

Steve Karafyllakis

http://www.stevekphoto.com

Re: Image management software

2002-06-05 by rikyu99

Thanks for the message about the Image Trak software. I demo'd the 
program yesterday, and emailed the developer Clayton Jones about some 
modifications he might do, things I liked. He was receptive and he 
even called me today to discuss some changes to the program.

It is specifically for photographers and is exactly the kind of 
simple program I need for keeping track of inventory, and it 
generates a nice consignment report with thumbnails that I can give 
to the gallery when I deliver work. I think Clayton will listen to 
the needs of photographers using the program...and I purchased the 
full program today.

thanks again,
ken smith
http://www.kensmithart.com


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "stevekphoto" <stevek@e...> 
wrote:
>Snip
> Also: a couple weeks ago I mentioned an image management program in 
> development called ITRAK; It is now available as a functional demo 
> if any one is interested: http://www.cjcom.net/itrakcore.htm  This 
> was written to do a few things well: keep track of your images and 
> prints, and provide you with a consignment record/inventory when 
you 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> send work out. A very usefull tool for exhibiting photographers.
> 
> Steve Karafyllakis
> 
> http://www.stevekphoto.com

Image management software

2006-01-18 by garethjolly

Firstly, a belated thank you to everyone on the list who helped me out
with advice.

After some fairly extensive trialling, I decided to go with Idimager
rather than Imatch or any of the others.  The reasons were:

- Idimager has a few useful features that Imatch doesn't - such as
archiving of images to removable media (with an inbuilt burning
facility); versions and ratings;

- the responsiveness of the author to suggestions and bugs is
fantastic.   Most of the bugs reported have been fixed inside a week -
sometimes days.  Not only that, but the author will happily add
features in response to suggestions - again, often within a week.  The
contrast to Imatch in this regard, is stark.  

- there are few useful features of imatch and bridge that idimager
doesn't have (yet) (e.g variable size for viewing of thumbs; bridge
'slide show' function for quickly rating & rotating images) but the
commitment to development means that this is likely to change in the
not too distant future;

- previous versions were a little slow on drawing up images but this
is now largely fixed.

Anyway, thanks again

Regards
Gareth

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.