Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Fade test July 2015

Fade test July 2015

2015-07-28 by roark.paul@...

I have posted a scan of my latest fade test at

http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/2nd-8wk-Fade-test-7-26-2015.jpg .


In this one I've included a test strip of Claria black only on Epson Premium Photo Paper Glossy. That combination was also tested by Mark at http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ . The comparison is interesting. I think my compact fluorescent light with no glass/UV filtering is probably causing the OBAs to burn out disproportionately fast. The higher heat and brightness in my setup is probably also causing the 100% K to fade faster. The midtone test patches look like 8 weeks in my fade tester (which sits in a water bath to keep humidity up) may be the equivalent to, on average, a bit more than AaI&A's 50 MLux-Hrs exposure, though direct comparisons are impossible due to the different fade environments.


There are both 16 week and 8 week samples in this test.


My all-Canon Lucia EX toner blend is in this test. The neutralized Eboni-6 test strip looks good. The toner does lose a little Lab A, but it's well within reasonable limits. Compare the neutralized Eb6 test strip to the fiber based silver print test at http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ .


I have not yet fully evaluated the test results myself and probably will not be able to for another week.


Paul

PaulRoark.com -- Paul Roark's Photographic Home



Re: [Digital BW] Fade test July 2015

2015-07-29 by Paul Roark

Here is an interesting way to evaluate the tone shifting of the Canon-based cold toner. Pull my scan of the neutralized Eboni-6 test strips -- control and faded -- into Photoshop. For comparison also do this with the visual representations of the test v. control samples at the top of each page of the http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ tests. I believe 50 Mlux-hrs is the closest, but even look at 40. Then slide the PS Image>Adjust>Hue-Saturation Saturation slider up to the max. That is, exaggerate the colors. The absolute colors won't have much meaning, particularly from my not well profiled scanner, but the differences between the control and faded samples become very obvious.

Let me know when you find a B&W fade test that has less color shift than the neutralized Eboni.

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:02 AM, roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I have posted a scan of my latest fade test at

http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/2nd-8wk-Fade-test-7-26-2015.jpg .


In this one I've included a test strip of Claria black only on Epson Premium Photo Paper Glossy. That combination was also tested by Mark at http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ . The comparison is interesting. I think my compact fluorescent light with no glass/UV filtering is probably causing the OBAs to burn out disproportionately fast. The higher heat and brightness in my setup is probably also causing the 100% K to fade faster. The midtone test patches look like 8 weeks in my fade tester (which sits in a water bath to keep humidity up) may be the equivalent to, on average, a bit more than AaI&A's 50 MLux-Hrs exposure, though direct comparisons are impossible due to the different fade environments.


There are both 16 week and 8 week samples in this test.


My all-Canon Lucia EX toner blend is in this test. The neutralized Eboni-6 test strip looks good. The toner does lose a little Lab A, but it's well within reasonable limits. Compare the neutralized Eb6 test strip to the fiber based silver print test at http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ .


I have not yet fully evaluated the test results myself and probably will not be able to for another week.


Paul

PaulRoark.com -- Paul Roark's Photographic Home

PaulRoark.com -- Paul Roark's Photographic Home
Paul Roark Black and White Photography
Preview by Yahoo




Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.