Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by paulmwhiting@...

For years I settled on darkroom prints using Ilford MG paper and Bainbridge Spanish White mat board. Under gallery lighting they looked great - I must have been showing under tungsten lighting. Then, as I moved to digital printing, I settled on carbon ink, Eboni to be exact, on Premier Art Fine Art paper in the 205 gsm weight. I mounted these prints on a slighter warmer board, Crescent #2299. Displaying these two kinds of prints side by side I could hardly tell the difference.

But a couple of days ago I was doing a small show at our local art museum and they had just switched to LED lighting. The darkroom prints looked fine, but my digital prints were decidedly warmer. Not much I can do about this... I think I'll have to live with this conundrum. Perhaps some of you have run into something similar. Gradually, as I sell my darkroom prints, I'll be reprinting on the digital setup and my shows will have more consistency. But I really am not fond of how they look. Maybe I'll have to move to a different printer inkset and a cooler mat board.

At home, and in clients' homes, this is not a problem for the time being. I suppose as our society gradually switches over to LED lighting I'll be up against this dilemma more and more. I notice LED lamps are hitting my local hardware store.

Any thoughts, advice, feedback would be most welcome... thank you!

Paul


Re: [Digital BW] LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by Paul Roark

I suspect there are differences among the various LED lights, but presumably your local art museum bought some with a reasonable CRI (Color Rendering Index). None of the LED CRI's that I've seen can match a Halogen light, however.

In side-by-side viewing, you can see a one unit Lab B difference -- barely. My original variable tone inkset was made so that I could show my digital prints in a mixed show with the silver prints. I don't do that any more, but the variable tone approach is still a good way to go, giving you the option of your 100% carbon while also having the toner there when needed to help match cooler prints. If you're using a 1430, take a look at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf .

I have the toner in fade testing now. Nothing is going to be as stable as your 100% carbon pigment prints, but this Canon Lucia EX based toner ought to keep the color shifts to a minimum. Since the pigments used are now both from the same Canon inkset, the http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ fade test of that inkset is going to give a better idea of the degree of shift. There is a patch in Mark's testing that has a very similar Lab A and B to the toner. In the last paragraph on page 5 of http://paulroark.com/BW-Info/3880-Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf I've done some calculations as to expected color drift. While I'm waiting for actual test data, the calculations based on Mark's work suggest the color drift will be well below the visible limits at 50 "Wilhelm years" of display.

BTW, where the carbon prints you displayed the original Eboni or Eboni v. 1.1?

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:43 AM, paulmwhiting@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

For years I settled on darkroom prints using Ilford MG paper and Bainbridge Spanish White mat board. Under gallery lighting they looked great - I must have been showing under tungsten lighting. Then, as I moved to digital printing, I settled on carbon ink, Eboni to be exact, on Premier Art Fine Art paper in the 205 gsm weight. I mounted these prints on a slighter warmer board, Crescent #2299. Displaying these two kinds of prints side by side I could hardly tell the difference.

But a couple of days ago I was doing a small show at our local art museum and they had just switched to LED lighting. The darkroom prints looked fine, but my digital prints were decidedly warmer. Not much I can do about this... I think I'll have to live with this conundrum. Perhaps some of you have run into something similar. Gradually, as I sell my darkroom prints, I'll be reprinting on the digital setup and my shows will have more consistency. But I really am not fond of how they look. Maybe I'll have to move to a different printer inkset and a cooler mat board.

At home, and in clients' homes, this is not a problem for the time being. I suppose as our society gradually switches over to LED lighting I'll be up against this dilemma more and more. I notice LED lamps are hitting my local hardware store.

Any thoughts, advice, feedback would be most welcome... thank you!

Paul



Re: [Digital BW] LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by paulmwhiting@...

Thanks, Paul,

My understanding of LED's is that its color temperature is about 3000 K. Where is Halogen on that scale?

I've seen an earlier version of your pdf (the first one) but now I see you've augmented it substantially. I'll have to print that out and study it carefully.

I didn't think Mark was accepting new tests... maybe that was a while back.

I'm still using Eboni 1.0. Amazing how long the Eboni-6 inkset lasts compared to the 3MK/1800 setup. But of course now I only have one cart that's 100% Eboni as opposed to three. About time to mix up a new set, however.

Paul

http://www.paulwhitingphotography.com

Re: [Digital BW] LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by Paul Roark

I think most halodens are also 3000 K. However, their spectral distribution is smoother. I think many LEDs have a cool lobe and then a warm (filtered) lobe.

I do not expect Mark to test this Canon based toner. However, he has tested the Canon inkset. I am once again doing my own fade testing. My procedures are not as rigorous as Marks, but we will see via some control strips how close I can get.

Paul
Www.PaulRoark.com

Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jul 9, 2015 8:56 AM, "paulmwhiting@yahoo.com [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint]" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thanks, Paul,

My understanding of LED's is that its color temperature is about 3000 K. Where is Halogen on that scale?

I've seen an earlier version of your pdf (the first one) but now I see you've augmented it substantially. I'll have to print that out and study it carefully.

I didn't think Mark was accepting new tests... maybe that was a while back.

I'm still using Eboni 1.0. Amazing how long the Eboni-6 inkset lasts compared to the 3MK/1800 setup. But of course now I only have one cart that's 100% Eboni as opposed to three. About time to mix up a new set, however.

Paul

http://www.paulwhitingphotography.com

Re: [Digital BW] LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by Dr. Elliot Puritz

The toner idea is very cleverly conceived and implemented. 

Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 10:50, Paul Roark roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> I suspect there are differences among the various LED lights, but presumably your local art museum bought some with a reasonable CRI (Color Rendering Index).  None of the LED CRI's that I've seen can match a Halogen  light, however.  
> 
> In side-by-side viewing, you can see a one unit Lab B difference -- barely.  My original variable tone inkset was made so that I could show my digital prints in a mixed show with the silver prints.  I don't do that any more, but the variable tone approach is still a good way to go, giving you the option of your 100% carbon while also having the toner there when needed to help match cooler prints.  If you're using a 1430, take a look at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf .
> 
> I have the toner in fade testing now.  Nothing is going to be as stable as your 100% carbon pigment prints, but this Canon Lucia EX based toner ought to keep the color shifts to a minimum.  Since the pigments used are now both from the same Canon inkset, the http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ fade test of that inkset is going to give a better idea of the degree of shift.  There is a patch in Mark's testing that has a very similar Lab A and B to the toner.  In the last paragraph on page 5 of http://paulroark.com/BW-Info/3880-Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf I've done some calculations as to expected color drift.  While I'm waiting for actual test data, the calculations based on Mark's work suggest the color drift will be well below the visible limits at 50 "Wilhelm years" of display.
> 
> BTW, where the carbon prints you displayed the original Eboni or Eboni v. 1.1?
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:43 AM, paulmwhiting@...m [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> Â 
>> For years I settled on darkroom prints using Ilford MG paper and Bainbridge Spanish White mat board. Under gallery lighting they looked great - I must have been showing under tungsten lighting. Then, as I  moved to digital printing, I settled on carbon ink, Eboni to be exact, on Premier Art Fine Art paper in the 205 gsm weight. I mounted these prints on a slighter warmer board, Crescent #2299. Displaying these two kinds of prints side by side I could hardly tell the difference.
>> 
>> Â 
>> 
>> But a couple of days ago I was doing a small show at our local art museum and they had just switched to LED lighting. The darkroom prints looked fine, but my digital prints were decidedly warmer. Not much I can do about this... I think I'll have to live with this conundrum. Perhaps some of you have run into something similar. Gradually, as I sell my darkroom prints, I'll be reprinting on the digital setup and my shows will have more consistency. But I really am not fond of how they look. Maybe I'll have to move to a different printer inkset and a cooler mat board.
>> 
>> Â 
>> 
>> At home, and in clients' homes, this is not a problem for the time being. I suppose as our society gradually switches over to LED lighting I'll be up against this dilemma more and more. I notice LED lamps are hitting my local hardware store.
>> 
>> Â 
>> 
>> Any thoughts, advice, feedback would be most welcome... thank you!
>> 
>> Â 
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-09 by Paul Roark

Note that the toner formula that the 3880 uses has a higher concentration of the Canon pigments than the version I used for the earlier 1430 and 7800 setups. The reasons include that the higher concentration allows the ABW mode printing of the 3880 to have at least some range. At least one paper can go from carbon warm to a delta-Lab B of 2 (that is, a maximum Lab B that is only 2 units over the paper base Lab B value), which many will see as neutral when not next to brightened paper or a cold toned paper. Also, it turns out that the higher concentration, which is still essentially the same density as the lightest carbon ink in the mix, does not show up as visible dots. Finally, (and frankly) the very dilute mix would have allowed a certain commercial seller to still make a profit at a low 4 oz. bottle price, but since that commercial outfit showed no interest, other factors became more important.

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM, 'Dr. Elliot Puritz' drpuritz@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

The toner idea is very cleverly conceived and implemented.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 9, 2015, at 10:50, Paul Roark roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I suspect there are differences among the various LED lights, but presumably your local art museum bought some with a reasonable CRI (Color Rendering Index). None of the LED CRI's that I've seen can match a Halogen  light, however. Â

In side-by-side viewing, you can see a one unit Lab B difference -- barely. My original variable tone inkset was made so that I could show my digital prints in a mixed show with the silver prints. I don't do that any more, but the variable tone approach is still a good way to go, giving you the option of your 100% carbon while also having the toner there when needed to help match cooler prints. If you're using a 1430, take a look at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf .

I have the toner in fade testing now. Nothing is going to be as stable as your 100% carbon pigment prints, but this Canon Lucia EX based toner ought to keep the color shifts to a minimum. Since the pigments used are now both from the same Canon inkset, the http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/ fade test of that inkset is going to give a better idea of the degree of shift. There is a patch in Mark's testing that has a very similar Lab A and B to the toner. In the last paragraph on page 5 of http://paulroark.com/BW-Info/3880-Eboni-Variable-Tone.pdf I've done some calculations as to expected color drift. While I'm waiting for actual test data, the calculations based on Mark's work suggest the color drift will be well below the visible limits at 50 "Wilhelm years" of display.

BTW, where the carbon prints you displayed the original Eboni or Eboni v. 1.1?

Paul

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:43 AM, paulmwhiting@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>; wrote:
Â

For years I settled on darkroom prints using Ilford MG paper and Bainbridge Spanish White mat board. Under gallery lighting they looked great - I must have been showing under tungsten lighting. Then, as I moved to digital printing, I settled on carbon ink, Eboni to be exact, on Premier Art Fine Art paper in the 205 gsm weight. I mounted these prints on a slighter warmer board, Crescent #2299. Displaying these two kinds of prints side by side I could hardly tell the difference.

Â

But a couple of days ago I was doing a small show at our local art museum and they had just switched to LED lighting. The darkroom prints looked fine, but my digital prints were decidedly warmer. Not much I can do about this... I think I'll have to live with this conundrum. Perhaps some of you have run into something similar. Gradually, as I sell my darkroom prints, I'll be reprinting on the digital setup and my shows will have more consistency. But I really am not fond of how they look. Maybe I'll have to move to a different printer inkset and a cooler mat board.

Â

At home, and in clients' homes, this is not a problem for the time being. I suppose as our society gradually switches over to LED lighting I'll be up against this dilemma more and more. I notice LED lamps are hitting my local hardware store.

Â

Any thoughts, advice, feedback would be most welcome... thank you!

Â

Paul




Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-10 by paulmwhiting@...

Paul,

I've been studying your pdf on EbVT and am finally beginning to get the hang of it. In my reading I learned there are two major color scales, CIE and Hunter. Can I assume you're working in CIE? What I read was that this protocol was more commonly used.

Noticed a small typo in the pdf - the second link's URL ends in "at page 6-7" and I had to delete that to get the link to connect. I'm sure most of your readers will have no trouble but there might be newbies who can't.

Any reason I can't go ahead and, if I can find those Canon carts locally, load my Y cart with your mix? I'm due for a new batch anyway. Care to divulge how you test for fading? I read about a procedure a while back (maybe it was yours) using a common reflector face down on the test print. The reflector had holes punched around the rim to lessen heating. I forget what bulb was used.

But wouldn't I still be faced with my LED gallery lighting issue? Crescent 2299 matches my Premier Art paper quite well... and under these LEDs, that's what shows up against my Spanish White board and Ilford MG paper. It's quite noticeable, more than 1 unit of B, if I understand the L a b language correctly.

Was pleased to see my submission way back is holding firm. Talk about newbies... I was still very green behind the ears. But I still have much to learn.

Paul

Re: [Digital BW] Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-10 by Paul Roark

Paul,

The L, A, B scale I reference is the CIE version.

Thanks for pointing out the URL problem/typo.

You should have no trouble mixing and loading the toner yourself. The dilute version for the 1400 family, written up at
uses 90% clear base, version c6b. You can mix that, or just buy it from MIS. They sell it for a reasonable price. I'm not sure if Canon sells the blue Lucia EX pigs in a small cart. The main barrier to trying this is the cost of those two Canon carts. Note my comment in fn 12 about how I drain the Canon carts. I tried a syringe and it was going to be way too annoying. I'm sure there is a more elegant way than I use, but it works. Be sure everything is totally clean.

My fader setup is shown at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Fader-Setup.pdf . It pumps out about 22K Lux, which is high. This dries the samples and will give an artificially long predicted life compared to one where the humidity is at 60. To partially offset this I have the fader sitting in a tray of water. But, I don't predict longevity by dividing the MLux hours in the fader by the average home or office exposure. I'm looking at relative fade compared to samples others have tested. It's a far from perfect predictor, but it's better than nothing. And, even before the water bath became my norm, when I did this early on and a couple companies threatened to sue me, they backed off when they saw what I was doing.

I'm not sure how the toned carbon samples would look compared to your old Ilford prints. You will have a high degree of control of Lab B just via curves or profiles. Lab A is set by the mix. I used a light selenium toning for my silver printing. That raises the Lab A a bit. The target for the toner mix is a level Lab A for Arches and a slightly elevated Lab A for the inkjet papers. So, if you get your Lab B equated but you find there is a bit too much of a reddish cast, change the toner mix a bit by reducing the blue and increasing the cyan. If you mix just one cart full at a time, you won't waste much ink in experimenting. Rather than trying to mix such small amounts of the concentrate, mix each color down to a 10% Canon pigment + 90% clear base first, and in large enough quantities to be accurate. Then you can alter the color ratios of the already diluted colors and be much more accurate and consistent about it.

Ultimately, you should be able to match the silver prints so closely that no one will see the difference if they are under glass/acrylic such that the matte v. glossy finish does not show.

My understanding of the spectral responses of silver and carbon are that they are both relatively smooth. Where you get into trouble with matching is where both the light source and colors that make up your "gray" are not smooth. It's the interactions of the peaks in the response curves that shows up. I assume the mat board is a non-OBA board with a smooth response also. My memory of the Ilford paper was that it was a bit warm, which I also assume means it had no OBAs in it.

Good luck with the mixing. Let me know how it goes.

Paul


Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, paulmwhiting@...m [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

I've been studying your pdf on EbVT and am finally beginning to get the hang of it. In my reading I learned there are two major color scales, CIE and Hunter. Can I assume you're working in CIE? What I read was that this protocol was more commonly used.

Noticed a small typo in the pdf - the second link's URL ends in "at page 6-7" and I had to delete that to get the link to connect. I'm sure most of your readers will have no trouble but there might be newbies who can't.

Any reason I can't go ahead and, if I can find those Canon carts locally, load my Y cart with your mix? I'm due for a new batch anyway. Care to divulge how you test for fading? I read about a procedure a while back (maybe it was yours) using a common reflector face down on the test print. The reflector had holes punched around the rim to lessen heating. I forget what bulb was used.

But wouldn't I still be faced with my LED gallery lighting issue? Crescent 2299 matches my Premier Art paper quite well... and under these LEDs, that's what shows up against my Spanish White board and Ilford MG paper. It's quite noticeable, more than 1 unit of B, if I understand the L a b language correctly.

Was pleased to see my submission way back is holding firm. Talk about newbies... I was still very green behind the ears. But I still have much to learn.

Paul


Re: [Digital BW] Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-10 by Ernst Dinkla

SpectrumViz also has the paper white spectral plots of the Ilford silver halide papers. They can be compared to the inkjet paper spectral plots.

Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst

Dinkla Grafische Techniek
Quad, piëzografie, giclée
www.pigment-print.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Paul Roark roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

The L, A, B scale I reference is the CIE version.

Thanks for pointing out the URL problem/typo.

You should have no trouble mixing and loading the toner yourself. The dilute version for the 1400 family, written up at
uses 90% clear base, version c6b. You can mix that, or just buy it from MIS. They sell it for a reasonable price. I'm not sure if Canon sells the blue Lucia EX pigs in a small cart. The main barrier to trying this is the cost of those two Canon carts. Note my comment in fn 12 about how I drain the Canon carts. I tried a syringe and it was going to be way too annoying. I'm sure there is a more elegant way than I use, but it works. Be sure everything is totally clean.

My fader setup is shown at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Fader-Setup.pdf . It pumps out about 22K Lux, which is high. This dries the samples and will give an artificially long predicted life compared to one where the humidity is at 60. To partially offset this I have the fader sitting in a tray of water. But, I don't predict longevity by dividing the MLux hours in the fader by the average home or office exposure. I'm looking at relative fade compared to samples others have tested. It's a far from perfect predictor, but it's better than nothing. And, even before the water bath became my norm, when I did this early on and a couple companies threatened to sue me, they backed off when they saw what I was doing.

I'm not sure how the toned carbon samples would look compared to your old Ilford prints. You will have a high degree of control of Lab B just via curves or profiles. Lab A is set by the mix. I used a light selenium toning for my silver printing. That raises the Lab A a bit. The target for the toner mix is a level Lab A for Arches and a slightly elevated Lab A for the inkjet papers. So, if you get your Lab B equated but you find there is a bit too much of a reddish cast, change the toner mix a bit by reducing the blue and increasing the cyan. If you mix just one cart full at a time, you won't waste much ink in experimenting. Rather than trying to mix such small amounts of the concentrate, mix each color down to a 10% Canon pigment + 90% clear base first, and in large enough quantities to be accurate. Then you can alter the color ratios of the already diluted colors and be much more accurate and consistent about it.

Ultimately, you should be able to match the silver prints so closely that no one will see the difference if they are under glass/acrylic such that the matte v. glossy finish does not show.

My understanding of the spectral responses of silver and carbon are that they are both relatively smooth. Where you get into trouble with matching is where both the light source and colors that make up your "gray" are not smooth. It's the interactions of the peaks in the response curves that shows up. I assume the mat board is a non-OBA board with a smooth response also. My memory of the Ilford paper was that it was a bit warm, which I also assume means it had no OBAs in it.

Good luck with the mixing. Let me know how it goes.

Paul



On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, paulmwhiting@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

I've been studying your pdf on EbVT and am finally beginning to get the hang of it. In my reading I learned there are two major color scales, CIE and Hunter. Can I assume you're working in CIE? What I read was that this protocol was more commonly used.

Noticed a small typo in the pdf - the second link's URL ends in "at page 6-7" and I had to delete that to get the link to connect. I'm sure most of your readers will have no trouble but there might be newbies who can't.

Any reason I can't go ahead and, if I can find those Canon carts locally, load my Y cart with your mix? I'm due for a new batch anyway. Care to divulge how you test for fading? I read about a procedure a while back (maybe it was yours) using a common reflector face down on the test print. The reflector had holes punched around the rim to lessen heating. I forget what bulb was used.

But wouldn't I still be faced with my LED gallery lighting issue? Crescent 2299 matches my Premier Art paper quite well... and under these LEDs, that's what shows up against my Spanish White board and Ilford MG paper. It's quite noticeable, more than 1 unit of B, if I understand the L a b language correctly.

Was pleased to see my submission way back is holding firm. Talk about newbies... I was still very green behind the ears. But I still have much to learn.

Paul



Re: [Digital BW] Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-10 by Paul Roark

​Ernst, I'd forgotten that silver print papers were included in your work. Thanks.

(I had to download a new Java program to open the file. I run Chrome, and I think there was a recent case that Oracle won v. Google on the Java code. So, it's been removed from Chrome. At any rate, the Java free download works fine.)

Paul, if the paper you're using is the Ilford Classic MG glossy, you may, in fact, be fighting OBAs in the Ilford paper. There is a distinct bump in the spectral response of that paper at the blue end. Ernst did not test the Premier Art 205/Epson Premier Art Scrapbook paper, but Epson's UltraSmooth is very similar. It totally lacks the blue bump. The LEDs may light up the OBAs more than the halogens.​ Although different manufacturers may have lights with different spectral responses, just Google "led spectrum" and you'll see a lot of graphs with blue spikes. On some LEDs lights you can see that they are using a yellow filter to control this.

If you don't have Ernst's paper database, be sure to get it at

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ernst Dinkla ernst.dinkla@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

SpectrumViz also has the paper white spectral plots of the Ilford silver halide papers. They can be compared to the inkjet paper spectral plots.

Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst

Dinkla Grafische Techniek
Quad, piëzografie, giclée
www.pigment-print.com

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Paul Roark roark.paul@gmail.com [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

The L, A, B scale I reference is the CIE version.

Thanks for pointing out the URL problem/typo.

You should have no trouble mixing and loading the toner yourself. The dilute version for the 1400 family, written up at
uses 90% clear base, version c6b. You can mix that, or just buy it from MIS. They sell it for a reasonable price. I'm not sure if Canon sells the blue Lucia EX pigs in a small cart. The main barrier to trying this is the cost of those two Canon carts. Note my comment in fn 12 about how I drain the Canon carts. I tried a syringe and it was going to be way too annoying. I'm sure there is a more elegant way than I use, but it works. Be sure everything is totally clean.

My fader setup is shown at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Fader-Setup.pdf . It pumps out about 22K Lux, which is high. This dries the samples and will give an artificially long predicted life compared to one where the humidity is at 60. To partially offset this I have the fader sitting in a tray of water. But, I don't predict longevity by dividing the MLux hours in the fader by the average home or office exposure. I'm looking at relative fade compared to samples others have tested. It's a far from perfect predictor, but it's better than nothing. And, even before the water bath became my norm, when I did this early on and a couple companies threatened to sue me, they backed off when they saw what I was doing.

I'm not sure how the toned carbon samples would look compared to your old Ilford prints. You will have a high degree of control of Lab B just via curves or profiles. Lab A is set by the mix. I used a light selenium toning for my silver printing. That raises the Lab A a bit. The target for the toner mix is a level Lab A for Arches and a slightly elevated Lab A for the inkjet papers. So, if you get your Lab B equated but you find there is a bit too much of a reddish cast, change the toner mix a bit by reducing the blue and increasing the cyan. If you mix just one cart full at a time, you won't waste much ink in experimenting. Rather than trying to mix such small amounts of the concentrate, mix each color down to a 10% Canon pigment + 90% clear base first, and in large enough quantities to be accurate. Then you can alter the color ratios of the already diluted colors and be much more accurate and consistent about it.

Ultimately, you should be able to match the silver prints so closely that no one will see the difference if they are under glass/acrylic such that the matte v. glossy finish does not show.

My understanding of the spectral responses of silver and carbon are that they are both relatively smooth. Where you get into trouble with matching is where both the light source and colors that make up your "gray" are not smooth. It's the interactions of the peaks in the response curves that shows up. I assume the mat board is a non-OBA board with a smooth response also. My memory of the Ilford paper was that it was a bit warm, which I also assume means it had no OBAs in it.

Good luck with the mixing. Let me know how it goes.

Paul



On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, paulmwhiting@yahoo.com [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

I've been studying your pdf on EbVT and am finally beginning to get the hang of it. In my reading I learned there are two major color scales, CIE and Hunter. Can I assume you're working in CIE? What I read was that this protocol was more commonly used.

Noticed a small typo in the pdf - the second link's URL ends in "at page 6-7" and I had to delete that to get the link to connect. I'm sure most of your readers will have no trouble but there might be newbies who can't.

Any reason I can't go ahead and, if I can find those Canon carts locally, load my Y cart with your mix? I'm due for a new batch anyway. Care to divulge how you test for fading? I read about a procedure a while back (maybe it was yours) using a common reflector face down on the test print. The reflector had holes punched around the rim to lessen heating. I forget what bulb was used.

But wouldn't I still be faced with my LED gallery lighting issue? Crescent 2299 matches my Premier Art paper quite well... and under these LEDs, that's what shows up against my Spanish White board and Ilford MG paper. It's quite noticeable, more than 1 unit of B, if I understand the L a b language correctly.

Was pleased to see my submission way back is holding firm. Talk about newbies... I was still very green behind the ears. But I still have much to learn.

Paul




Re: [Digital BW] Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-11 by Ernst Dinkla

It is Dutch but this is the English version of the Olino lamp pages, you will not find better independent tests of lamps though it will not cover every lamp on the planet:

http://www.olino.org/advice/us

Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst

Dinkla Grafische Techniek
Quad, piëzografie, giclée
www.pigment-print.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Paul Roark roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

​Ernst, I'd forgotten that silver print papers were included in your work. Thanks.

(I had to download a new Java program to open the file. I run Chrome, and I think there was a recent case that Oracle won v. Google on the Java code. So, it's been removed from Chrome. At any rate, the Java free download works fine.)

Paul, if the paper you're using is the Ilford Classic MG glossy, you may, in fact, be fighting OBAs in the Ilford paper. There is a distinct bump in the spectral response of that paper at the blue end. Ernst did not test the Premier Art 205/Epson Premier Art Scrapbook paper, but Epson's UltraSmooth is very similar. It totally lacks the blue bump. The LEDs may light up the OBAs more than the halogens.​ Although different manufacturers may have lights with different spectral responses, just Google "led spectrum" and you'll see a lot of graphs with blue spikes. On some LEDs lights you can see that they are using a yellow filter to control this.

If you don't have Ernst's paper database, be sure to get it at

Paul

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ernst Dinkla ernst.dinkla@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

SpectrumViz also has the paper white spectral plots of the Ilford silver halide papers. They can be compared to the inkjet paper spectral plots.

Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst

Dinkla Grafische Techniek
Quad, piëzografie, giclée
www.pigment-print.com

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Paul Roark roark.paul@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

The L, A, B scale I reference is the CIE version.

Thanks for pointing out the URL problem/typo.

You should have no trouble mixing and loading the toner yourself. The dilute version for the 1400 family, written up at
uses 90% clear base, version c6b. You can mix that, or just buy it from MIS. They sell it for a reasonable price. I'm not sure if Canon sells the blue Lucia EX pigs in a small cart. The main barrier to trying this is the cost of those two Canon carts. Note my comment in fn 12 about how I drain the Canon carts. I tried a syringe and it was going to be way too annoying. I'm sure there is a more elegant way than I use, but it works. Be sure everything is totally clean.

My fader setup is shown at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Fader-Setup.pdf . It pumps out about 22K Lux, which is high. This dries the samples and will give an artificially long predicted life compared to one where the humidity is at 60. To partially offset this I have the fader sitting in a tray of water. But, I don't predict longevity by dividing the MLux hours in the fader by the average home or office exposure. I'm looking at relative fade compared to samples others have tested. It's a far from perfect predictor, but it';s better than nothing. And, even before the water bath became my norm, when I did this early on and a couple companies threatened to sue me, they backed off when they saw what I was doing.

I'm not sure how the toned carbon samples would look compared to your old Ilford prints. You will have a high degree of control of Lab B just via curves or profiles. Lab A is set by the mix. I used a light selenium toning for my silver printing. That raises the Lab A a bit. The target for the toner mix is a level Lab A for Arches and a slightly elevated Lab A for the inkjet papers. So, if you get your Lab B equated but you find there is a bit too much of a reddish cast, change the toner mix a bit by reducing the blue and increasing the cyan. If you mix just one cart full at a time, you won't waste much ink in experimenting. Rather than trying to mix such small amounts of the concentrate, mix each color down to a 10% Canon pigment + 90% clear base first, and in large enough quantities to be accurate. Then you can alter the color ratios of the already diluted colors and be much more accurate and consistent about it.

Ultimately, you should be able to match the silver prints so closely that no one will see the difference if they are under glass/acrylic such that the matte v. glossy finish does not show.

My understanding of the spectral responses of silver and carbon are that they are both relatively smooth. Where you get into trouble with matching is where both the light source and colors that make up your "gray" are not smooth. It's the interactions of the peaks in the response curves that shows up. I assume the mat board is a non-OBA board with a smooth response also. My memory of the Ilford paper was that it was a bit warm, which I also assume means it had no OBAs in it.

Good luck with the mixing. Let me know how it goes.

Paul



On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, paulmwhiting@... [DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint] <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Paul,

I've been studying your pdf on EbVT and am finally beginning to get the hang of it. In my reading I learned there are two major color scales, CIE and Hunter. Can I assume you're working in CIE? What I read was that this protocol was more commonly used.

Noticed a small typo in the pdf - the second link's URL ends in "at page 6-7" and I had to delete that to get the link to connect. I'm sure most of your readers will have no trouble but there might be newbies who can't.

Any reason I can't go ahead and, if I can find those Canon carts locally, load my Y cart with your mix? I'm due for a new batch anyway. Care to divulge how you test for fading? I read about a procedure a while back (maybe it was yours) using a common reflector face down on the test print. The reflector had holes punched around the rim to lessen heating. I forget what bulb was used.

But wouldn't I still be faced with my LED gallery lighting issue? Crescent 2299 matches my Premier Art paper quite well... and under these LEDs, that's what shows up against my Spanish White board and Ilford MG paper. It's quite noticeable, more than 1 unit of B, if I understand the L a b language correctly.

Was pleased to see my submission way back is holding firm. Talk about newbies... I was still very green behind the ears. But I still have much to learn.

Paul





Re: LED lighting in art gallery - some issues

2015-07-11 by paulmwhiting@...

I think you're on to something here, Paul. I've done some research and I'm quite sure that Ilford Classic (fka IV) MG glossy has OBAs. Someone suggested I look at a print on that paper and a carbon print of the same photo on my Premier Art FineArt paper under sunlight. I held them side by side and I couldn't see any difference. The gallery just installed these LED lights only a few weeks ago. I wonder if other artists will have issues.

In the gallery, as you say it must be the LED lightening up the OBAs in the Ilford FB paper. What I'm more concerned with is the discrepancy between the two prints' paper and mat board. The difference in the blacks between the two is hardly noticeable, at least to my relatively untrained eye.

I've still got 1/2 pint of Eboni 1.0 so I've decided to stick with the original Carbon-6 inkset's Y dilution till I finish that Eboni. Maybe by that time the Canon ink will be in more affordable quantities. I do mix my own C6b - with an Ohaus digital scale that's accurate to .1 gm. I've got the open source mix-your-own procedure to where I'm comfortable with that procedure. I already had some Photo-Flo and LFN on hand from my darkroom days, and I get glycerine from my local CVS.

Thanks for link to your fade test setup. I'm looking forward to your results.

Paul

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.