I just got my 1400 and my MIS eboni-6 inks are coming in a couple days so no direct experience yet, however I chose this route after reading a number of threads and asking both Paul and Clayton directly on their thoughts. If the 1400 was $500 and the 1100 $129 then it might be worth considering but for less than $100 difference? On picoliter size along it's a no-brainer I think.... -- Richard S. Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area) My Photography Website http://www.lightshadowandtone.com My Flickr River http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/ On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:44 AM, kwalsh74 <kwalsh74@...> wrote: > > > > I don't have experience with the 1100 or any of the 4-ink printers, but I'd > also say you should look very closely at the 1400. 6-ink and 1.5 pL drops > makes it an amazing B&W printer (compared with the 3 pL drops of the 1100). > $189 with free shipping from Amazon makes it not much more than the 1100 at > $129. Keep in mind, a box of quality 13x19 paper is going to be $80 minimum! > > Because of the small drop size the 1400 can do amazingly good prints with > just 100% Eboni (no dilutions) or very smooth prints with just one > additional dilution. This makes either buying or mixing dilutions easy as > you don't have to do so many. You do probably want to use QTR instead of the > epson driver for these approaches. On the other hand if you really only want > to do a C4 approach the 1100 would be fine - as long as it can handle > thicker papers. The 1400 has a track record of being able to handle fine art > papers when fed carefully, I'm not sure anyone has experience with the 1100 > yet. > > Paul Roark has lots of info on workflows for 1.5 pL printers and I believe > is currently using a few 1400's. > > Ken > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Epson A3+ Four Inkset Printer
2010-01-19 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.