Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2MK+2PK+ approach?

2007-11-20 by Carl Schofield

I found that you don't really need the lighter inks and toners in the  
1800.  I'm now using 3 Eboni, 3 RCNTL-PKN (MIS neutral PK), and 1  
glop.  This lets me print matte or glossy at will and I use warm or  
cool papers to vary print hue.  The newer fiber papers like Harman's  
Glossy Al yield beautiful B&W prints with the PKN in the 1800.

Carl

On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:58 AM, Joost Horsten wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for you reply.
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@...> wrote:
>>
>> The reason I used the 1800 for the 3-MK approach is that it has
> the smaller
>> 1.5 picoliter drops.  The 2100/2200 would be too rough for my
> tastes if it
>> used just the Eboni MK for an image, no matter how many jets it
> had firing.
>
> I realize I didn't make myself sufficiently clear.
>
> I appreciate that the 3MK approach (and therefor also the proposed
> 2MK+2PK approach) require the finer drops. So I did not mean to
> propose this approach for a 2100/2200 but for an R1800 instead. The
> idea would be to start from your 3MK approach on a R1800 but add the
> full flexibility of gloss printing and toning, while still keeping
> the advantages of the 3MK approach.
>
> What would be your insight in this?
>
> Joost
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.