Digital BW, The Print

Hi Paul,

Thanks for you reply. 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> The reason I used the 1800 for the 3-MK approach is that it has 
the smaller
> 1.5 picoliter drops.  The 2100/2200 would be too rough for my 
tastes if it
> used just the Eboni MK for an image, no matter how many jets it 
had firing.

I realize I didn't make myself sufficiently clear. 

I appreciate that the 3MK approach (and therefor also the proposed 
2MK+2PK approach) require the finer drops. So I did not mean to 
propose this approach for a 2100/2200 but for an R1800 instead. The 
idea would be to start from your 3MK approach on a R1800 but add the 
full flexibility of gloss printing and toning, while still keeping 
the advantages of the 3MK approach.  

What would be your insight in this?

Joost