Jamie, > ... your write-up on UT-3D that's got me all fired up again. I'd become discouraged about the UT-3D inkset with all the production and profiling disappointments. But, now it looks like it might finally realize the potential I was aiming at. The MIS production batch I received a couple of weeks ago was good, and now with ColorVision's software apparently able to profile the inkset, it's really got me excited about it again also. The thought of a dedicated B&W inkset that can be manipulated like a color inkset might be very interesting indeed. I'll be testing the latest PrintFIXPro software with it as soon as I can. (It's downloading as I write this.) >What ink configurations are people using with the R1800 - > perhaps UT7 or a custom mix? The 1800 is different than the printers I've worked on. So, it really needs a different approach to optimize it. I think Cone has a monotone for it, but, as is obvious, I'm not a fan of inflexible inksets. Right now I have not recommendation for it. > I take it that with the R2400, UT-3D works OK? Yes, although it'll be interesting to see how the K3 with Y=EZW compares to the 3D in terms of quality and flexibility. I had originally thought of the 3D inkset as for 6 and 7 ink printers. The 2400 was just sort of tacked on. It works fine with it, but it remains to be seen whether that is the optimum B&W use of that machine. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT-3D ink configuration for R220, R1800 and R2400
2006-11-23 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.