Digital BW, The Print

Mike,

Did you download the test files:

Purge6-2.jpg. <http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Purge6-2.jpg>  

Purge6-2-UT2-NCA.jpg <http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Purge6-2-UT2-NCA.jpg>  

Purge6-2-UT2-cc.jpg. <http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Purge6-2-UT2-cc.jpg> 

These are the instructions that are posted for this:

 

"To see if the inkset in your printer has the correct inks, download the UT2
or UT7 files. Print the color original file as a color image with no curves
or profiles on Epson Enhanced Matte paper (sold as "Archival Matte" outside
the U.S.). Then compare the prints you get with the scans of prints that I
have made. 

"Note that my scanners colors and densities may differ. So, don't expect an
exact match. 

"The scanned images have on then what settings were used. 

"It is a good practice to print a purge pattern to keep track of the colors
of the inks in your inkset. As you buy new cartridges, you will then have a
frame of referrence should it appear that the inks may have changed. 

"You can just click on these file names, and they should appear on your
monitor. They right click on the image and "Save Picture As...""

 

Let me know if the inks appear to be the right ones or not.

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mowens
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:53 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 1280, UT2, EEM can't print cool

 

Paul,

It appears you are as dedicated to the board as I hope to be some day!

Thanks for the tip. I've started with both BW and color files in all
sorts of profiles (sRGB IEC...mostly). I converted both to adobe rgb
98 with gamma 2.2 before applying curve, then printing. No color
corrections in printing, so no gamma to pick in printing.

When I start with other files, they are usually in rgb and I have to
convert to BW. I've done this mainly by image>adjustments>color
mixer>monochrome + % R, G or B. Is this correct? I don't add any
Hue/saturation at this point.

My BO printing was very neutral, and easily cool. I added the other 5
cartridge UT2 inks and can't get rid of sepia...that's why I thought
it was just a matter of purging ink from the system. But after some
head cleans and 30 pics? 

MO

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> Mike,
> 
> 
> 
> Use the test strips at http://home1.
<http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Test-files.htm>
gte.net/res09aij/Test-files.htm
to check
> the inkset.
> 
> 
> 
> Be sure you're starting with a grayscale file in Gray Gamma 2.2
workspace.
> Sometimes there are embedded profiles that can mess things up. When
you're
> ready to print, then convert to RGB, apply the curve, check the driver
> settings, etc.
> 
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroar <http://www.paulroark.com/> k.com/>

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
mowens
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 10:00 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] 1280, UT2, EEM can't print cool
> 
> 
> 
> applied Paul Roark's UT2-EEM different curves to adobe RGB 98
> workspace print with predominate sepia (or brown) tone. Coolest I can
> get is light, light cream on a white backdrop image. Can't attain
> any silver or even blue tones. I tried not using curves, but changing
> color sliders for CMY too, same result. 
> 
> Black is eboni, standard T009 UT2 inkset, cleaned heads, printed about
> 20 images so far. After applying curves, printing with all color
> settings off, same adobe 98 rgb workspace. Tried different paper
> settings (matte heavyweight, and others), even printed on Canon Photo
> Paper Pro just to see...same tone.
> 
> Seems it is the inkset, not the paper or settings? 
> 
> Thanks in advance...
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]