Hi Richard: My 2 cents --- I think an image should be dated (and copyrighted) to the date created or captured; a print should be accompanied by a note (or certificate of authenticity if it's sold) stating both the date of creation and the date of printing. On the print, I sign with the copyright date. OOT: That's a great quote from Ma Ferguson --- where did you come across that? Bert katzung1@... www.astronomy-images.com www.visionlightgallery.com/katzung/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Smallfield" <r.smallfield@...> To: "Digital BW Print" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:13 PM Subject: [Digital BW] OT - dating prints Hi, I've been in a quandary about whether I should date my prints by the capture date or the printing date - to give both dates is rather cumbersome, although I'm signing my exhibition prints on the back, so there's room for both dates. Any thoughts? thanks in advance, Richard -- http://smallfield.vze.com http://photos.smallfield.vze.com "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" --"Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas
Message
Re: [Digital BW] OT - dating prints
2006-03-19 by Bert Katzung
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.