> Also, anti-aliasing _must_ be done with a diffuser over the sensor, and > can't be done after the fact through calculation. Once the image is > spatially sampled by the sensor layout pattern, it's too late to fix > aliasing. Please don't mention that to the millions of photoshop users who do anti-aliasing every day... ;-) I don't believe that's correct, and that anti-aliasing is, in fact, a pretty darned (read: NSA) sophisticated algorithm (I learned to spell it... :-) There are both optical and digital approaches to anti-aliasing. > > > Take a camera RAW of 6 megs, and blend the three layers to your liking > > for full tonal range, and you'll have a perfectly sharp 6 meg photo. > > What if the image has detail only in the red or blue channel? Consider the > case of some tree branches against blue water, or some telephone wires > against a red wall. In that case, virtually all the detail is in one > channel, and adding the other two does nothing. That's true... but even if you toss out the 2 of the 3 channels entirely, you -still- have a 6 megapixel image ... Cordially Tracy > > Your other points I basically agree with. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@i...
Message
Re: Black and white only digital camera
2004-12-18 by tvalleau
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.